2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.idairyj.2005.10.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interactions between bacteria type, proteolysis of casein and physico-chemical properties of bovine milk

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
132
3
14

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(161 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
12
132
3
14
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, negative correlations were found with each of the bacterial group with the strongest in E. coli-infected quarters. The results of this study reinforce the findings that bacterial infection in general and certain bacteria species in particular are the major causes of impaired coagulation properties of milk from infected glands, either of the gland or the cow level (Leigh and Lincoln, 1997;Leitner et al, 2006;Merin et al, 2008). Of the bacteria species, E. coli and Strep.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast, negative correlations were found with each of the bacterial group with the strongest in E. coli-infected quarters. The results of this study reinforce the findings that bacterial infection in general and certain bacteria species in particular are the major causes of impaired coagulation properties of milk from infected glands, either of the gland or the cow level (Leigh and Lincoln, 1997;Leitner et al, 2006;Merin et al, 2008). Of the bacteria species, E. coli and Strep.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The differences in cheese yield in relation to bacterial infection were demonstrated before (Leitner et al, 2006;Merin et al, 2008) and the deleterious effect of the different bacteria was further highlighted in this study. It is assumed that parts of the effects noted in these studies are strongly related to the milk-clotting parameters as influenced by the different infecting bacteria.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 51%
“…These results indicate that proteases from bacterial origin predominantly affect κ-casein, while ß-casein and α s-casein were less susceptible to bacterial proteases. These findings are supported by previous studies by McPhee and Griffiths (2002); Datta and Deeth (2003); Kahina et al (2005); Leitner et al (2006) and Isabelle et al (2008) who reported that κ-caseins were preferential substrates for bacterial proteases, and that β-and α s-caseins were hydrolysed to a lesser extent. Sorhaug and Stepaniak (1997) reported that proteases from different species and strains of Pseudomonas differ in their substrate specificities toward milk proteins.…”
Section: Proteolysis Of Uht Milk With Added Pseudomonas Proteinase Ansupporting
confidence: 88%
“…In a comparative study of casein hydrolysis and its effect on clotting parameters in milk from cows that were sub-clinically infected with four major udder pathogens (Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Streptococcus dysgalactiae and Staphylococcus chromogenes), Leitner et al (2006) found that milk from infected glands possessed inferior clotting parameters. Since TRL2 is known to protect casein against hydrolysis by bacterial enzymes, the association of TLR2 with a better milk clotting aptitude could reflect increased protection of caseins by the A variant of TLR2.…”
Section: Association Analysis With Traditional Mcpsmentioning
confidence: 99%