2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ccell.2021.05.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interactions between cancer cells and immune cells drive transitions to mesenchymal-like states in glioblastoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

21
291
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 340 publications
(349 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
21
291
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The most broadly accepted transcriptional classification of GBM was originally based on gene expression profiles of bulk tumors ( Verhaak et al, 2010 ), which did not discriminate the contribution of tumor cells and TME to the transcriptional signatures. It is now becoming evident that both cell-intrinsic and -extrinsic cues can contribute to the specification of the MES subtype ( Bhat et al, 2013 ; Hara et al, 2021 ; Neftel et al, 2019 ; Schmitt et al, 2021 ; Wang et al, 2017 ). Bhat and colleagues had shown that while some of the MES GBMs maintained the mesenchymal characteristics when expanded in vitro as BTSCs, some others lost the MGS after few passages while exhibiting a higher non-MGSs ( Bhat et al, 2013 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most broadly accepted transcriptional classification of GBM was originally based on gene expression profiles of bulk tumors ( Verhaak et al, 2010 ), which did not discriminate the contribution of tumor cells and TME to the transcriptional signatures. It is now becoming evident that both cell-intrinsic and -extrinsic cues can contribute to the specification of the MES subtype ( Bhat et al, 2013 ; Hara et al, 2021 ; Neftel et al, 2019 ; Schmitt et al, 2021 ; Wang et al, 2017 ). Bhat and colleagues had shown that while some of the MES GBMs maintained the mesenchymal characteristics when expanded in vitro as BTSCs, some others lost the MGS after few passages while exhibiting a higher non-MGSs ( Bhat et al, 2013 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proneural subtype GBMs, which show the best prognosis among the three molecular subtypes, had significantly lower signature of CD4+ T-cells and the classical GBM showed significantly stronger dendritic cell signature [66]. Hara et al (2021) performed an extensive investigation of the cross-talk between the immune microenvironment and the mesenchymal GBM subtype [71]. Using a mouse glioma model induced via transduction with the lentivirus harboring GFP, Hras G12V and sh-p53, the authors confirmed a presence of the tumor cell states consistent with the ones observed in human glioblastomas [12].…”
Section: Immune Microenvironment In the Molecular Subtypes Of Gbmmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Hara et al (2021) performed an extensive investigation of the cross-talk between the immune microenvironment and the mesenchymal GBM subtype [ 71 ]. Using a mouse glioma model induced via transduction with the lentivirus harboring GFP, Hras G12V and sh-p53, the authors confirmed a presence of the tumor cell states consistent with the ones observed in human glioblastomas [ 12 ].…”
Section: Immune Microenvironment Of Malignant Gliomas—insights From Single-cell Omicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, hypoxia activated the ANXA2–STAT3–OSMR signalling axis [ 145 ]. Moreover, it has been recently published that mesenchymal-like transitions in glioblastoma cells are driven by macrophage-derived OSM [ 146 ].…”
Section: Role Of Il-6 and Osm In Epithelial–mesenchymal Plasticitymentioning
confidence: 99%