2015
DOI: 10.1128/aem.02690-15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interactions between Closely Related Bacterial Strains Are Revealed by Deep Transcriptome Sequencing

Abstract: e Comparative genomics, metagenomics, and single-cell technologies have shown that populations of microbial species encompass assemblages of closely related strains. This raises the question of whether individual bacterial lineages respond to the presence of their close relatives by modifying their gene expression or, instead, whether assemblages simply act as the arithmetic addition of their individual components. Here, we took advantage of transcriptome sequencing to address this question. For this, we analy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
26
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
2
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The apparent experience of stress by WDL1 favors the latter hypothesis. Furthermore, a large number of differentially expressed genes in WDL1 and WDL7 were coding for hypothetical, putative, and unknown proteins which was also observed in similar studies with other consortia (Frias‐Lopez & Duran‐Pinedo, ; Gonzalez‐Torres et al., ; Kimes, Lopez‐Perez, Auso, Ghai, & Rodriguez‐Valera, ). These uncharacterized proteins might include novel functions that are important for the well‐functioning of consortia and their study is of interest for gaining more insight into the synergistic mechanisms in bacterial consortia.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The apparent experience of stress by WDL1 favors the latter hypothesis. Furthermore, a large number of differentially expressed genes in WDL1 and WDL7 were coding for hypothetical, putative, and unknown proteins which was also observed in similar studies with other consortia (Frias‐Lopez & Duran‐Pinedo, ; Gonzalez‐Torres et al., ; Kimes, Lopez‐Perez, Auso, Ghai, & Rodriguez‐Valera, ). These uncharacterized proteins might include novel functions that are important for the well‐functioning of consortia and their study is of interest for gaining more insight into the synergistic mechanisms in bacterial consortia.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…In contrast to the nondifferential expression of metabolic pathways in WDL7, its growth rate does seem to increase in consortium conditions based on the abundant overexpression of one third of WDL7 genes encoding for ribosomal proteins. This has been described before in other consortia and was suggested to be a metric of in situ growth rate (Gonzalez-Torres et al, 2015;Perez et al, 2015). A higher growth rate is also expected for WDL1 in consortium conditions from the increase of DNA synthesis (Ward & Glaser, 1971).…”
Section: Coculturing Of Strains Modulates Additional Metabolic Pathsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…The fact that phenotypes were defined using a predefined binning grid and based on a limited number of phenotypic traits makes it difficult to make a link with functionality and to fully understand the underlying biological or ecological process that caused the phenotypic diversity shift. Additional examination of the transcriptome (39,49,50) or exometabolite profiles (51), or the use of mutant libraries, could provide valuable insights in the cause of the phenotypic adaptation and the functional consequences that the change in phenotypic state might bring. In addition, more validated and automated pipelines for detection of biomolecules based on single-cell Raman spectra would be an interesting improvement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To assess the level of genetic perturbations due to addition of ETEC as an interaction partner to V. cholerae cultures, we conducted a dual RNAseq analysis 64-67 of V. cholerae co-cultures (Figure 1, Step 4) with each of the two ETEC strains (E36 or E616). We then compared the gene expression levels for each pathogen to its single-culture (see methods section and Tables S7-S10 at https://github.com/alyamahmoud/coinfection_modeling/blob/master/supplementary_material/supplementary_tables.xlsx).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%