2005
DOI: 10.1090/conm/385/07205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interactions between dynamics, arithmetics and combinatorics: the good, the bad, and the ugly

Abstract: Abstract. The aim of this paper is to survey possible generalizations of the well-known interaction between Sturmian sequences and rotations of T 1 , using the Euclid algorithm of continued fraction approximation. We investigate mainly similar relations between Arnoux-Rauzy sequences and rotations of T 2 , between codings of Z 2 -actions on T 1 and multidimensional Sturmian sequences, between exchanges of intervals and some sequences of linear complexity, and give an account of several tentative generalization… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
44
0
5

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
1
44
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…, α k which are rearranged by I according to π. It was Rauzy [29] who first saw interval exchange transformations as a possible framework for generalizing the well-known interaction between circle rotations on one hand and Sturmian sequences on the other via the continued fraction algorithm (see, for example, the survey [7] [4]. But, in contrast with the Sturmian case, though this induction gives access to the symbolic dynamics of the trajectories, it is difficult to describe them explicitly and indeed the Rauzy induction was never actually used for that purpose.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, α k which are rearranged by I according to π. It was Rauzy [29] who first saw interval exchange transformations as a possible framework for generalizing the well-known interaction between circle rotations on one hand and Sturmian sequences on the other via the continued fraction algorithm (see, for example, the survey [7] [4]. But, in contrast with the Sturmian case, though this induction gives access to the symbolic dynamics of the trajectories, it is difficult to describe them explicitly and indeed the Rauzy induction was never actually used for that purpose.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A useful generalization of this process to simultaneous approximation of several numbers is obtained by replacing rotations by interval exchange transformations, see for example the survey [2]; the additive form of a general process for exchanges of k intervals was given by Rauzy [15], it was then proved by Veech [17] and Masur [13] that the renormalization (or induction) map has an infinite invariant measure, and this was the source of many important results in the theory of interval exchange transformations; a multiplicative form was then derived by Zorich [18], who showed that it has a finite invariant measure. Another induction was proposed by da Rocha, it is dual to the first one in a sense precised in section 2.1 below; again, the additive form has an infinite invariant measure [11] and the multiplicative form has a finite invariant measure [3], and in both cases there is an explicit formula for the density with respect to the Lebesgue measure.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This refers to what is called Rauzy program in [43]: "find generalizations of the Sturmian/rotation interaction which would naturally generate approximation algorithms". Revisited with the Arnoux-IO formalism [24], this means to start from a n-dimensional vector u in R n and to decompose this vector with a continued fraction algorithm, u = M 1 M 2 .…”
Section: Effective Constructions and Generalizationsmentioning
confidence: 99%