2003
DOI: 10.3354/meps258031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interactions between nutrients, phytoplankton growth, and micro- and mesozooplankton grazing in the plume of the Mississippi River

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
63
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
6
63
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This evidence thus supports our conclusion that (42 mm) eukaryotes, particularly diatoms, were responsible for the carbon fixation and CO 2 drawdown we and others (Cai, 2003;Lohrenz and Cai, 2006) have observed in the MRP, and not picoplankton such as Synechococcus or picoeukaryotes which exist in much greater numbers throughout the plume area. Our findings also support the existing paradigm of MRP phytoplankton community dynamics, which dictates that production led by diatoms is prevalent in the mid-salinity plume where river water mixes with the Gulf of Mexico (Bode and Dortch, 1996;Lohrenz et al, 1999;Liu and Dagg, 2003;Liu et al, 2004;.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…This evidence thus supports our conclusion that (42 mm) eukaryotes, particularly diatoms, were responsible for the carbon fixation and CO 2 drawdown we and others (Cai, 2003;Lohrenz and Cai, 2006) have observed in the MRP, and not picoplankton such as Synechococcus or picoeukaryotes which exist in much greater numbers throughout the plume area. Our findings also support the existing paradigm of MRP phytoplankton community dynamics, which dictates that production led by diatoms is prevalent in the mid-salinity plume where river water mixes with the Gulf of Mexico (Bode and Dortch, 1996;Lohrenz et al, 1999;Liu and Dagg, 2003;Liu et al, 2004;.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…A major proportion of mesozooplankton filtering-feeder species exhibit sizeselective feeding behavior and prefer large-sized phytoplankton, determined by limits of feeding appendages. Our results showed that large-sized phytoplankton (>20 µm) (mainly diatoms and dinoflagellates) were generally cleared by mesozooplankton with high rates, which had also been reported by many field studies in coastal and estuarine waters (e.g., Liu and Dagg, 2003;Liu et al, 2010). Therefore, the general role of mesozooplankton in natural seawaters was to directly consume large-sized phytoplankton (mostly diatoms and autotrophic dinoflagellates), which made the consumers important in the classic food chain, in addition to regulating microbial food web.…”
Section: The Effect Of Mesozooplankton Size-selective Feedingsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Generally, small-sized phytoplankton (<5 µm) were the preferential food items for microzooplankton, while they were generally too small to be directly ingested by the majority of mesozooplankton species (Calbet and Landry, 1999;Froneman, 2002;Liu and Dagg, 2003;Liu et al, 2005a and this study). A parallel study of our research through HPLC pigment analysis also showed that the clearance rates of mesozooplankton on small-sized phytoplankton, green algae and Synechococcus, were generally negative due to trophic cascades (Liu et al, 2010).…”
Section: The Effect Of Mesozooplankton Size-selective Feedingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the experiment both techniques were tested with a 200 mm net for pre-screening. Pre-screening is routine in dilution experiments and excludes mesozooplankton grazers ensuring that only the microzooplankton grazing is measured (Liu & Dagg, 2003;Fonda Umani et al, 2005;Sakka Hlaili et al, 2007).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%