1986
DOI: 10.1017/s0003356100017694
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interactions between supplementary nitrogen source and ration energy density on performance and nitrogen utilization in growing and fattening male cattle

Abstract: Four diets containing 9-6 MJ metabolizable energy (ME) per kg dry matter (DM) (LMEC), and four diets containing 11-3 MJ/kg DM (HMEC) were formulated. One diet of each ME concentration contained 90 g crude protein (CP) per kg DM and served as a negative control (NC). In the three other diets of each ME concentration, the level of CP was raised to 140 g/kg DM by inclusion of poultry litter (PL), non-protein nitrogen (NPN) or fish meal (FM). These diets were examined in a digestion and N balance trial and in a fe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results were in agreement with those found by El-Badawi et al (2003) and Mousa (2011). Generally, the superiority in nitrogen retention due to a specific ration is affected by several factors such as possible production of microbial protein synthesis, increasing presence of fermentable energy (Hagemeister et al, 1981), variability in nitrogen that might escape fermentation from the rumen, an increased utilization of ammonia in the rumen (Holzer et al, 1986) and the effect of free fats in protein synthesis (Sutton et al, 1983).…”
Section: Dry Matter Intake Digestibility Nutritive Values and Nitrogen Utilizationsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…These results were in agreement with those found by El-Badawi et al (2003) and Mousa (2011). Generally, the superiority in nitrogen retention due to a specific ration is affected by several factors such as possible production of microbial protein synthesis, increasing presence of fermentable energy (Hagemeister et al, 1981), variability in nitrogen that might escape fermentation from the rumen, an increased utilization of ammonia in the rumen (Holzer et al, 1986) and the effect of free fats in protein synthesis (Sutton et al, 1983).…”
Section: Dry Matter Intake Digestibility Nutritive Values and Nitrogen Utilizationsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Generally, the superiority in nitrogen retention due to a specific ration is affected by several factors such as possible production of microbial protein synthesis, increasing presence of fermentable energy (Hagemeister et al 1981), differences in availability of fermentable energy (Tagari et al 1976), variability in nitrogen that might escape fermentation from the rumen, an increased utilization of ammonia in the rumen (Holzer et al 1986), and the effect of free fats in protein synthesis (Sutton et al 1983). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One probable explanation for the increase in the nitrogen balance could be related to the improvement in the production of microbes and, as a result, increased production of microbial protein. In addition, the improvement in nitrogen balance could be related to the increase in the utilization of ammonia [ 31 ] and/or due to the availability of fermentable carbohydrates in the rumen.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%