262, 163-168). This led that author to conclude that ROS PLA 2 could be involved in the phototransduction process, and raised the possibility of receptor-mediated activation of PLA 2 via G-proteins in cell types other than rods. However, the biochemical characteristics and the role of this PLA 2 have not been fully elucidated. We have tried to reproduce some of the results previously reported in order to further characterize this enzyme. We have found that, in our hands, there is neither light-dependent nor GTP-dependent PLA 2 activity in intact purified ROS. We also failed to detect PLA 1 activity in those ROS preparations. Nevertheless, we detected significant amounts of PLA 2 activity in two subretinal fractions adjacent to ROS: RPE (enriched with retinal pigment epithelial cells) and P200 (presumably containing neuronal cells, Mü ller cells, and rod inner segments). The enzyme present both in RPE and P200 is light-and GTP-independent, Ca 2؉ -and Mg 2؉ -independent, and seems to be optimally active in the alkaline pH range. Our results suggest that there is, if any, vanishingly little PLA 2 or PLA 1 activity in intact purified ROS and that the activity levels previously reported in the literature could have been due to a contamination by either RPE or P200. This is supported by our observation that some contaminated ROS preparations were "PLA 2 active."In the mammalian eye, rod outer segments (ROS) 1 consist of a stack of 1000 -2000 disks which contain the visual pigment, rhodopsin. ROS are thus responsible for the phototransduction process. It has been clearly shown that following absorption of light, photoexcited rhodopsin binds to and activates transducin (T␣␥), which is a member of the heterotrimeric GTP-binding protein family. During the activation of transducin, the GDP molecule (normally associated with the inactive state of the protein) is exchanged for GTP. As a consequence, transducin dissociates into T␣ and T␥ subunits. T␣ is well known to activate a cGMP-phosphodiesterase whose activity eventually leads to hyperpolarization of the rod through closure of Na ϩ / Ca 2ϩ cGMP-dependent channels (see Refs. 1-4 for reviews). Jelsema reported in 1987 (5) that phospholipase A 2 (PLA 2 ) activity was present in "crude ROS" and "partially purified ROS," and that this activity was stimulated by light and a non-hydrolyzable analog of GTP, GTP␥S. Moreover, Jelsema and Axelrod (6) demonstrated that T␥ was responsible for the activation of this ROS PLA 2 . These results led them to conclude that ROS PLA 2 could be involved in the phototransduction process. However, conflicting results have been reported since that time. In fact, although Zimmerman and Keys (8) detected phospholipase A activity in their ROS preparations, the activity that they measured, either PLA 2 or PLA 1 , was neither light-dependent nor GTP-dependent. It was rather stimulated by ATP and coenzyme A (CoA). Moreover, the maximum activity that they observed was approximately 1 order of magnitude lower than that reported by Jelsema (5). In addi...