2006
DOI: 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[2559:iobafo]2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interactions of Bacteria and Fungi on Decomposing Litter: Differential Extracellular Enzyme Activities

Abstract: Fungi and bacteria are key agents in plant litter decomposition in freshwater ecosystems. However, the specific roles of these two groups and their interactions during the decomposition process are unclear. We compared the growth and patterns of degradative enzymes expressed by communities of bacteria and fungi grown separately and in coexistence on Phragmites leaves. The two groups displayed both synergistic and antagonistic interactions. Bacteria grew better together with fungi than alone. In addition, there… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
270
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 400 publications
(281 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
9
270
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The two main groups of these decomposers are bacteria and fungi, and they are involved in both aerobic and anaerobic degradation of organic matter. These microbes produce extracellular enzymes to convert polymeric compounds, such as cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin, in the SOM into smaller molecules that can be further assimilated inside the microbial cells (Romaní et al, 2006). Fungi are more efficient than bacteria in the degradation of highly recalcitrant organic matter because they can produce a wider range of extracellular enzymes than bacteria (Szafranek-Nakonieczna and Stêpniewska, 2014).…”
Section: Soil Heterotrophic Respiration (Rh)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two main groups of these decomposers are bacteria and fungi, and they are involved in both aerobic and anaerobic degradation of organic matter. These microbes produce extracellular enzymes to convert polymeric compounds, such as cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin, in the SOM into smaller molecules that can be further assimilated inside the microbial cells (Romaní et al, 2006). Fungi are more efficient than bacteria in the degradation of highly recalcitrant organic matter because they can produce a wider range of extracellular enzymes than bacteria (Szafranek-Nakonieczna and Stêpniewska, 2014).…”
Section: Soil Heterotrophic Respiration (Rh)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, for the abandoned arable soil a better fungal growth in woodblocks as compared to sawdust may be caused by a lower competitive pressure of bacteria. A negative effect of bacteria on fungal growth has been suggested to be due to bacterial release of lytic enzymes degrading fungal cell walls, to the production of antifungal compounds (antibiotics) or to the competition for available organic compounds between bacteria and fungi (De Boer et al 2003;Romani et al 2006). Since there is a lower decomposition rate in sawdust as compared to woodblocks, we assume that there are negative effects (antagonism) of bacteria on fungi and vice versa resulting in a net lower decomposition.…”
Section: Soil Originmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microbial communities (Table 3) A large number of studies that describe microbial dynamics in the sediment have been supported by potential activities measured in the laboratory, for organic matter degradation (Sinsabaugh et al, 1993;Romani et al, 2006) or nitrogen cycling (Pinay and De´camps, 1988;Clement et al, 2002;Sabater et al, 2003;Lefebvre et al, 2005). There is likely a substantial gap between these experimental activities and the intensity of the processes that take place in situ (Pinay and De´camps, 1988;Sa´nchez-Pe´rez et al, 2003a, b;Iribar et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%