2002
DOI: 10.1002/1099-0682(200203)2002:3<723::aid-ejic723>3.0.co;2-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interactions of Remote Alkyl Groups with Lanthanide Metal Centers: Synthesis, Characterization and Ligand Redistribution Reactions of Heterobimetallic Species Containing Trialkylaluminum Fragments

Abstract: The reaction of [Ln(OAr) 3 ] 2 with four equivalents of trialkylaluminum leads to the formation of the bis-trialkylaluminum adducts (ArO)Ln[(µ-OAr)(µ-R)AlR 2 ] 2 [Ln = La, R = Me (1); Ln = La, R = Et (3); Ln = Sm, R = Et (4)]. The X-ray crystal structure of 1 reveals short La−C(bridging) distances of 2.800(5) and 2.759(5) Å . A reduced 1 J C-H coupling constant of 110 Hz and a low energy ν(C−H) stretch in the solution and solid state IR spectra are consistent with a strong agostic La···H−C interaction in solut… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

12
26
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
12
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compound 2 also maintains a short Sm−C distance (i.e. aluminum-bound methyl group) of 2.649(14) Å, which is similar to the Sm−C(alkyl group) distances previously determined for (ArO)Sm[μ-OAr)(μ-R)AlR 2 ] 2 (R = Me, 2.620(5) and 2.632(5) Å; R = Et, 2.627(4) and 2.649(4) Å) . This distance is slightly shorter than typical Ln−C distances found in complexes containing bridging methyl groups and suggests the presence of an agostic interaction between the aluminum methyl group(s) and the metal center.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Compound 2 also maintains a short Sm−C distance (i.e. aluminum-bound methyl group) of 2.649(14) Å, which is similar to the Sm−C(alkyl group) distances previously determined for (ArO)Sm[μ-OAr)(μ-R)AlR 2 ] 2 (R = Me, 2.620(5) and 2.632(5) Å; R = Et, 2.627(4) and 2.649(4) Å) . This distance is slightly shorter than typical Ln−C distances found in complexes containing bridging methyl groups and suggests the presence of an agostic interaction between the aluminum methyl group(s) and the metal center.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…At this point, we suspected that the residual aluminum complex was being generated in solution as a result of the decomposition of 2 . We have recently observed similar redistribution reactions in related 4f-element complexes supported by phenoxide ligation . However, thermolysis experiments did not indicate any significant decomposition, suggesting that difficulties in obtaining pure samples of 2 are due to the similar solubility properties of [Me 2 Al(NHAr)] 2 and [(μ-ArN)Sm(μ-NHAr)(μ-Me)AlMe 2 ] 2 ( 2 )…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…There is only one related compound having the La-[(Alkyl/ Aryl) 3 Al(OAlkyl/OAryl)] motif (CSD refcode MIMPED; Giesbrecht et al, 2002) , 2.367 (3) Å ] and Al-C [2.040 (5), 2.053 (6) Å ] bond lengths within the LaAl 2 (-Me) 2 (-OAryl) 2 fragment are similar to those found in the LaAl(-Me)(-OMe) fragment of the complex reported herein. However, the La1-C2 distance in the title compound (Table 1) is considerably longer (by 0.24-0.28 Å ) than the corresponding La-C distances in MIMPED [2.800 (5), 2.759 (5) Å ], presumably due to steric reasons.…”
Section: Figuresupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Cg1, Cg2, Cg3 and Cg4 are the centroids of the C33-C38, C39-C44, C52-C57 and C19-C24 rings, respectively. Occhipinti et al, 2011;GEQMOF, GEQMUL, Fischbach et al, 2006b) Biagini et al, 1994;WAPYIV, WAPYOB, Evans et al, 1993a;WEHHAS, Evans et al, 1993b) Fischbach et al, 2003;MIMPED, Giesbrecht et al, 2002;MOQYOG, Gordon et al, 2002;PETMUX, Fischbach et al, 2006c) Giesbrecht et al, 2002;ROCHOH, Sommerfeldt et al, 2008) Evans et al, 1998). MIMPED is the only La structure among them.…”
Section: Database Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8,9 Yellow [(C 5 Me This emphasizes the delicate balance that allows 2 to be isolated. Although there are several examples of adduct formation between lanthanide alkoxides and trialkyl aluminium, [12][13][14] to our knowledge there is only one other example of a structurally characterized adduct of a lanthanide carboxylate with trialkyl aluminium, {Me 2 Al(O 2 CC 6 H 2 i Pr 3 -2,4,6) 2 } 2 Nd(AlMe 4 ). 15 Complex 2 not only is a model for the intermediate in alkylaluminium activation of a lanthanide carboxylate, but it also has an unusual structure that bears on the relative Lewis acidities of aluminium samarium.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%