2011 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro 2011
DOI: 10.1109/isbi.2011.5872598
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interactive 3D brain vessel segmentation from an example

Abstract: Segmentation of cerebral vascular networks from 3D angiographic data remains a challenge. Automation generally induces a high computational cost and possible errors, while interactive methods are hard to use due to the dimension and complexity of images. This article presents a compromise between both approaches, by using the concept of examplebased segmentation. Segmentation examples of vascular structures are involved in a scheme relying on connected filtering, in order to obtain an interactive -but strongly… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The (discrete) direction e 1 of B(x) is approximated from the images of regularized direction fields, I The SE-based adjunct dilation, resulting in the image δ B (I in ), is followed by the adjunct erosion ε B . Both computations (δ B and ε B ), whose results are formally defined by Equations (19) and (16) respectively, then provide the final filtering result F(I in ) = ϕ B (I in ) with a low algorithmic cost (see Proposition 4). Also note that this processing ensures idempotence, guaranteeing that the filter obeys morphological rules.…”
Section: Step 3: Vessel Reconnectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The (discrete) direction e 1 of B(x) is approximated from the images of regularized direction fields, I The SE-based adjunct dilation, resulting in the image δ B (I in ), is followed by the adjunct erosion ε B . Both computations (δ B and ε B ), whose results are formally defined by Equations (19) and (16) respectively, then provide the final filtering result F(I in ) = ϕ B (I in ) with a low algorithmic cost (see Proposition 4). Also note that this processing ensures idempotence, guaranteeing that the filter obeys morphological rules.…”
Section: Step 3: Vessel Reconnectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Section 4, which is an extended and improved version of the conference articles [71,70], describes a vessel filtering method based on a hybrid strategy, merging both new spatially variant mathematical morphology algorithms and derivative-based approaches. Section 5, which is an extended and improved version of the conference articles [56,19], describes an example-based interactive vessel segmentation method relying on a component-tree-based technique. Section 6 describes and discusses experimental results related to vessel segmentation and filtering performed on angiographic phantom images and in vivo cerebral MRA data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let M ⊆ Ω be a binary vascular marker defined on the support Ω of the image I. In the method initially proposed in [10], the vascular volume S ⊆ Ω segmented from I is obtained by computing the subset N ⊆ N of nodes of T that "fit at best" the vascular marker M , which is assumed to provide a first approximation of the sought vessels.…”
Section: Component Tree-based Segmentation: a Fuzzy Versionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [9], Caldairou et al proposed to consider vectorial attributes for node selection, leading a segmentation method that requires a classification process to discriminate the relevant nodes in a wide parameter space. In [10], we investigated a different methodology, that no longer uses a "local" description of each node. The main idea is to come back to the definition of the component tree, and to consider -more globally-the nodes as the generators of the image.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation