Interactive and Lightweight Mechanisms to Coordinate Interpersonal Privacy in Mediated Communication

Romero, Natalia; Boer, Laurens; Markopoulos, Panos

doi:10.1007/978-3-642-03658-3_86

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

General Discussion and Conclusion1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2011

2021

Publication Types

Select...

Article2

Other1

Relationship

Self Cite1

Independent2

Authors

Journals

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The analysis so far has shown that interruption negotiation is a dynamic process. Other authors have examined this negotiation as a collaborative effort to reach a mutual understanding about the communicative contract [67,68]. This argument is supported by the research reported in this article, to which we also contribute an account of the relevant factors that should be shared.…”

Section: General Discussion and Conclusionsupporting

confidence: 71%

The Dynamic Nature of Availability

Szóstek¹

2011

TOREGJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: General Discussion and Conclusionsupporting

confidence: 71%

The Dynamic Nature of Availability

Szóstek¹

2011

TOREGJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Grounding Privacy in Mediated Communication

Romero

Markopoulos

Greenberg

2012

Comput Supported Coop Work

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper addresses interpersonal privacy coordination in the context of mediated communication, emphasizing the dialectic and dynamic nature of privacy. We contribute the Privacy Grounding Model − built upon the Common Ground theory − that describes how connected individuals create and adapt privacy borders dynamically and in a collaborative process. We present the theoretical foundations of the model. We also show the applicability of the model, where we give evidence from two case studies that illustrate how it can describe privacy coordination among users of an instant messaging application and a desktop awareness system. More generally, we believe designers can use the Privacy Grounding Model to reflect on how their system supports or fails to support people's lightweight privacy coordination mechanisms, and in particular how communicators within the system create and use privacy border representations as common ground. Finally we briefly consider the design of interactive and lightweight privacy grounding mechanisms.

show abstract