Interactive dimensions for leadership: an integrative literature review and model to promote ethical leadership praxis in a global society

Tenuto, Penny L.; Gardiner, Mary E.

doi:10.1080/13603124.2017.1321783

Cited by 12 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 71 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Leadership is traditionally defined as the position or ability to lead a group or an organization and the ability to elicit the cooperation of organization members or help them achieve common goals. However, in the 21st century, ethical leadership has emerged as a new leadership condition and qualification, as it has been found that unethical behaviors of leaders often cause bankruptcies and social problems in large corporations [133][134][135]. Nowadays, good leadership does not just dwell on the ability to maximize the gains of the organization or group by matching the organization members' attitudes, values, and beliefs with the organization's goals and vision.…”

Section: Ethical Leadershipmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of Chief Executive Officer’s Sustainable Leadership Styles on Organization Members’ Psychological Well-Being and Organizational Citizenship Behavior

Choi

2021

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Situational leadership theory and the contingency approach of leadership were utilized and applied based on situational theory. Based on a total of four foundational theories, that is, bottom-up spillover theory, theories of prosocial behavior, and so on, this study empirically analyzed what influence a chief executive officer’s (CEO’s) sustainable leadership styles (servant, ethical, and authentic leadership) have on the psychological well-being and organizational citizenship behaviors of organization members. The study was conducted on adult employees of midsized or larger companies (including subsidiaries) across four countries: South Korea, the United Kingdom, the United States, and South Africa. Data were obtained from 649 adult employees. SmartPLS was used to conduct structural equation modeling analysis of the data. The results were as follows: (1) CEOs’ servant and authentic leadership styles had statistically significant positive (+) effects on employees’ psychological well-being; however, ethical leadership did not. (2) CEOs’ ethical leadership had a statistically significant (+) effect on employees’ organizational citizenship behavior; however, servant and authentic leadership did not. (3) Employees’ psychological well-being had a statistically significant (+) effect on organizational citizenship behavior. CEOs are attracting more attention than ever, leading companies in today’s rapidly changing times. This suggests that it is necessary to comprehend principles that show when, where, and how important leaders are and sustainable leadership styles that can increase their chances of success. Moreover, this study derived constructive implications that a leader can overcome today’s challenges through sustainable leadership styles.

show abstract

Section: Ethical Leadershipmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of Chief Executive Officer’s Sustainable Leadership Styles on Organization Members’ Psychological Well-Being and Organizational Citizenship Behavior

Choi

2021

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Although the literature on preparing future instructional supervisors to supervise for equity is scarce, the idea fits squarely within the more general literature on preparing educational leaders committed to social justice (e.g., Beachum, 2011; Khalifa, Gooden, & Davis, 2016; Tenuto & Gardiner, 2018; Theoharis, 2007, 2010). This article aligns with a growing body of literature that calls for graduate programs to equip school leaders to “increase their awareness of various explicit and implicit forms of oppression, develop an intent to subvert the dominant paradigm, and finally act as a committed advocate for educational change that makes a meaningful and positive change in the education and lives of traditionally marginalized and oppressed students” (Jean-Marie et al, 2009, p. 4).…”

Section: Supervising For Equity (Sfe)mentioning

confidence: 85%

Redefining Supervision: A Joint Inquiry Into Preparing School-Based Leaders to Supervise for Equity

Garver

Maloney

2019

Journal of Research on Leadership Education

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article documents two professors’ inquiry into a lesson on supervising for equity in a supervisor preparation course. Through an iterative process of lesson design, lesson implementation, analysis of student work, and pedagogical discussion, we refine the lesson. Our study sheds light on the potential challenges of preparing supervisors to promote equity, offers pedagogical insights to leadership programs invested in instilling a commitment to social justice, and reflects the promise of collaborative faculty inquiry for curriculum development. The study contains implications for educational leadership faculty and program coordinators as well as facilitators of professional development for school leaders.

show abstract

“…Educational leaders and faculty can provide necessary input and choose a leadership framework that best fits the needs of their program and culture of the organization in which they work. Pedagogically centered leadership (English et al, 2012), social justice and leadership (Bogotch, 2002), caring leadership (Louis et al, 2016), inclusive leadership (Theoharis & Scanlan, 2015), cultivating democratic professional practice in education (Tenuto, 2014(Tenuto, , 2015, and promoting ethical leadership praxis in a global society (Tenuto & Gardiner, 2018) are some of the approaches or frameworks found in the literature for fostering caring and inclusive communities in education. Equally important are understandings of social and emotional constructs, cultural awareness, and critical reflection as part of a foundational vision for practices in education and beyond.…”

Section: Leadership Praxis In a Global Societymentioning

confidence: 99%

Teaching in a global society: Considerations for university-based educational leadership

Tenuto

2021

JGER

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Those who work in university-based programs are in a unique position to positively influence teaching, leading, and learning in the 21st century—whether in traditional face-to-face classrooms or online. To ensure culturally responsive practices, postsecondary faculty and administrators must be proactive about critically reflecting on their own professional praxes related to adult learning. This paper offers a mini-review of concepts derived from the literature for promoting inclusive postsecondary learning communities in a diverse and global society. This conceptually based paper blends current practices with traditional adult learning theories and includes considerations for those who work in university-based programs that prepare educational leaders.

show abstract

Interactive dimensions for leadership: an integrative literature review and model to promote ethical leadership praxis in a global society

Cited by 12 publications

References 71 publications

Effect of Chief Executive Officer’s Sustainable Leadership Styles on Organization Members’ Psychological Well-Being and Organizational Citizenship Behavior

Effect of Chief Executive Officer’s Sustainable Leadership Styles on Organization Members’ Psychological Well-Being and Organizational Citizenship Behavior

Redefining Supervision: A Joint Inquiry Into Preparing School-Based Leaders to Supervise for Equity

Teaching in a global society: Considerations for university-based educational leadership

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About