1998
DOI: 10.1080/00220979809598342
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interactive Effects of Graphic Organizers and Delayed Review on Concept Application

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
29
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
4
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They found that, when students studied the material in a 1-hr session followed by a 15-min review session two days later, text plus GOs was better than text plus outlines or text alone for learning concept relations and applying that knowledge. Robinson, Katayama, Dubois, and Devaney (1998) replicated the Robinson and Kiewra study and concluded that the delayed review was instrumental for optimal GO effectiveness.…”
Section: In Three Experiments We Investigated the Optimal Presentatimentioning
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…They found that, when students studied the material in a 1-hr session followed by a 15-min review session two days later, text plus GOs was better than text plus outlines or text alone for learning concept relations and applying that knowledge. Robinson, Katayama, Dubois, and Devaney (1998) replicated the Robinson and Kiewra study and concluded that the delayed review was instrumental for optimal GO effectiveness.…”
Section: In Three Experiments We Investigated the Optimal Presentatimentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Although the results of the Robinson and Kiewra (1995) and Robinson et al (1998) studies suggest that GOs work best when provided to students during both initial text acquisition and delayed review as previously noted, this sequence requires teacher involvement. Collecting study materials from students and not allowing them to review them until a few days later does not seem practical, and imposes additional, perhaps unwelcome, teacher responsibilities.…”
Section: In Three Experiments We Investigated the Optimal Presentatimentioning
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Supportive information can be called schematic information when it is presented in graphical representations or organizers such as matrices or diagrams (Van Merriënboer et al 2006). Presentation of information in the form of graphical organizers offers hierarchical and coordinate relations for relevant aspects of the learning tasks (Robinson et al 1998;Van Merriënboer et al 2006). Procedural information refers to task-specific rules and step-by-step instructions on how to handle routine and recurrent aspects of the learning tasks.…”
Section: Various Types Of Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It appears that when stored in memory, the relational connections aid in efficient retrieval. Robinson, Katayama, Dubois and Devaney (1998) investigated the use of graphic organizers as a study aid for tests with 110 undergraduate psychology students in a state university using a 3 x 2 design. The first variable was study materials with text only, text plus outlines, or text plus graphic organizers with the second variable being study occasion.…”
Section: Graphic Organizers: An Efficient Way To Help Retrieve and Stmentioning
confidence: 99%