1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-9452(99)00055-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interactive effects of nitrate and long-term waterlogging on growth, water relations, and gaseous exchange properties of maize (Zea mays L.)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
33
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
6
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…LWP in W4 (treatment 4) decreased significantly compared to W3 (treatment 3). This finding was in keeping with earlier research, with many scholars reporting that the LWP reduced under waterlogging treatment compared to under non-waterlogging treatment, owing to rapid stomatal closure when waterlogging occurred [39]. Moreover, this research revealed that the waterlogging treatment (W4) significantly influenced the LWP more than the moderate drought (W2), especially in ST3.…”
Section: Water Condition Indicatorssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…LWP in W4 (treatment 4) decreased significantly compared to W3 (treatment 3). This finding was in keeping with earlier research, with many scholars reporting that the LWP reduced under waterlogging treatment compared to under non-waterlogging treatment, owing to rapid stomatal closure when waterlogging occurred [39]. Moreover, this research revealed that the waterlogging treatment (W4) significantly influenced the LWP more than the moderate drought (W2), especially in ST3.…”
Section: Water Condition Indicatorssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Some caution is warranted however as growth conditions in this experiment were poor and plant growth was not as vigorous as observed in earlier experiments conducted in the same glasshouse. Low light conditions and high soil moisture (to facilitate in situ soil solution collection, results not presented) coupled with severe P deficiency (Steffens et al 2005) contributed to poorer growth (Ashraf and Habibur 1999). However all plants were exposed to the same growing conditions and P uptake by maize was comparable to similar studies undertaken by Bah et al (2006) on setaria grass, leading us to conclude these results are significant.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Foliar N applications significantly increased stomatal conductance along with root respiratory activity, leaf greenness and photosynthetic rate in waterlogged wheat plants [19]. In contrast, Ashraf [47] reported that stomatal conductance decreased due to waterlogging irrespective of the amount of N applied before the waterlogging event. Hybrid #2 had higher stomatal conductance than Hybrid #1 in 2014 (252 vs. 237 mmol m −2 s −1 ) and 2015 (293 vs. 269 mmol m −2 s −1 ) (data not presented).…”
Section: Stomatal Conductance During Waterloggingmentioning
confidence: 92%