2013
DOI: 10.3758/s13420-013-0108-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interactive effects of the probability of the cue and the probability of the outcome on the overestimation of null contingency

Abstract: Overestimations of null contingencies between a cue, C, and an outcome, O, are widely reported effects that can arise for multiple reasons. For instance, a high probability of the cue, P(C), and a high probability of the outcome, P(O), are conditions that promote such overestimations. In two experiments, participants were asked to judge the contingency between a cue and an outcome. Both P(C) and P(O) were given extreme values (high and low) in a factorial design, while maintaining the contingency between the t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
89
1
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
9
89
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Elucidation of the illusion of control that emphasizes the role of coincidences between behavior and environmental changes is an important step toward providing a basic background for understanding behavioral and learning mechanisms that are related to the origins of false beliefs (Blanco, 2017;Blanco et al, 2009Blanco et al, , 2011Blanco et al, , 2012Blanco et al, , 2013Matute, 1996;Matute et al, 2007). The present data support this approach to better understand the general notion of the illusion of control.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Elucidation of the illusion of control that emphasizes the role of coincidences between behavior and environmental changes is an important step toward providing a basic background for understanding behavioral and learning mechanisms that are related to the origins of false beliefs (Blanco, 2017;Blanco et al, 2009Blanco et al, , 2011Blanco et al, , 2012Blanco et al, , 2013Matute, 1996;Matute et al, 2007). The present data support this approach to better understand the general notion of the illusion of control.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…This position is strongly supported by accumulating evidence that higher levels of activity of one participant are positively correlated with higher estimates of control in the context of noncontingent outcomes (Blanco & Matute, 2015;Blanco, Matute, & Vadillo, 2009Matute, Vadillo, Vegas, & Blanco, 2007). Additionally, a high probability of outcomes is also correlated with the overestimation of personal control (Blanco, Matute, & Vadillo, 2013;Moreno-Fernández, Blanco, & Matute, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Most importantly for our present purposes, illusion of control effects have already been replicated both in the laboratory and through the Internet using associative learning procedures similar to the one we are using here (e.g., Matute et al, 2007; Blanco et al, 2013). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Another variable that is known to affect this illusion is the probability of responding (or, more generally, the probability with which the potential cause occurs; e.g., Allan and Jenkins, 1983; Matute, 1996; Wasserman et al, 1996; Perales et al, 2005; Hannah and Beneteau, 2009; Matute et al, 2011; Vadillo et al, 2011). The higher these two probabilities, the higher the probability that coincidences will occur between the potential cause and the outcome, and thus, the higher the probability than an illusion of control will develop (see Blanco et al, 2011, 2013; Hannah and Beneteau, 2009). …”
Section: Contingency Learning and The Illusion Of Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Por ejemplo, la tradición asociacionista, encarnada en el conductismo y el conexionismo, da prioridad a la sucesión regular de eventos y el descubrimiento de la contingencia potencial que existe entre tales elementos (Musca, Vadillo, Blanco, & Matute, 2008). El punto clave aquí es que la comprensión causal emerge de procesos más básicos, como el de la detección de la regularidad estadística (Blanco et al, 2013). De otro lado, la idea de Piaget (1929) de la causación como agencia (e. g., capacidad para ejercer control sobre los eventos del entorno a partir de la propia acción) convierte a la entrevista en la técnica privilegiada para indagar si los niños se consideran o no agentes causales de fenómenos cotidianos, como la sucesión de día y noche.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified