2020
DOI: 10.1080/07370024.2020.1734931
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interactive machine teaching: a human-centered approach to building machine-learned models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
55
0
5

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
55
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Dove et al [209] surveyed to understand how design innovation is practiced in the ML domain in terms of user experience. [63], [70], [165], [174], [211] [124], [125], [128], [175], [217] [69], [112], [113], [118], [130], [131], [133], [135], [137], [140], [144], [152], [153], [155] [49], [57], [67], [98], [110], [114], [180], [192], [193], [203], [214], [215] [48], [59], [62], [75], [79], [111], [120], [156], [159], [185], [195], [197], [207], [218] [65], [83],…”
Section: Survey Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Dove et al [209] surveyed to understand how design innovation is practiced in the ML domain in terms of user experience. [63], [70], [165], [174], [211] [124], [125], [128], [175], [217] [69], [112], [113], [118], [130], [131], [133], [135], [137], [140], [144], [152], [153], [155] [49], [57], [67], [98], [110], [114], [180], [192], [193], [203], [214], [215] [48], [59], [62], [75], [79], [111], [120], [156], [159], [185], [195], [197], [207], [218] [65], [83],…”
Section: Survey Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They have conducted an evaluation study with ML students to validate their tool. To make machine learning models accessible to non-AI-experts, Ramos et al [ 195 ] showed how to leverage intrinsic human capabilities of teaching to teach machines to do machine learning.…”
Section: Classifying Hcml Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some participants rationalized machine suggestions: even when they saw a decision they did not agree with, they forgave the system because the system did not have the full picture: "(P11) I feel like maybe I trained it poorly and it would not highlight good things, but I'm still super interested in that highlighting feature." Other participants wanted to correct an incorrect suggestion by teaching the system what it did wrong or what to look for in clips, highlighting a "teaching" moment that future systems could design for [29].…”
Section: Machine Suggestions Were Accepted As Partmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…O desenvolvimento de aplicativos de ML não é trivial e o seu processo de desenvolvimento difere de um software tradicional, pois envolve adquirir um conjunto rotulado de exemplos, selecionar um algoritmo de aprendizado apropriado e seus parâmetros, treinar um modelo, avaliar as previsões desse modelo em relação ao conjunto de testes e, finalmente, sua implantação em produção (Ramos et al, 2020). Normalmente, os modelos de ML são desenvolvidos usando linguagens de programação baseadas em texto que requerem codificação.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified