2021
DOI: 10.1029/2021jf006179
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interannual Dynamics of Ice Cliff Populations on Debris‐Covered Glaciers From Remote Sensing Observations and Stochastic Modeling

Abstract: Debris-covered glaciers are widespread in all mountain ranges around the globe (Herreid & Pellicciotti, 2020b;Scherler et al., 2018) and especially in High Mountain Asia (HMA), where half of the glaciers larger than 2 km 2 have more than 5% of their total area covered by a layer of rock debris (Herreid & Pellicciotti, 2020b) varying in thickness from centimeter to meter scale. These glaciers are often characterized by undulating, hummocky topography (Bartlett et al., 2020) and their surface is punctuated by su… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The analysis of high-resolution (<0.2 m) multitemporal UAV orthoimages and DEMs at five of the glaciers in this study shows that 79% of the newly formed cliff area from 202 cliff formation events is related to the presence of streams or ponds, which indicates that these hydrological features directly influence ice cliff formation (Text S1 and Figure S2 in Supporting Information S1). Such association is further confirmed by field observations (Figure 2g-2i) at numerous sites for both the formation and persistence of ice cliffs (Anderson, Armstrong, Anderson, Scherler, & Petersen, 2021;Brun et al, 2016;Kneib et al, 2021;Mölg et al, 2020;Sato et al, 2021). This association between streams and cliffs or ponds and cliffs, and the decreasing density of cliffs with distance from these features (Figure 2a) leads us to define a 40 m-buffer around ponds and streams within which we classify the cliff pixels as pond-influenced or stream-influenced (Figure 2).…”
Section: Influence Of Supraglacial Hydrology On Ice Cliff Distributionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The analysis of high-resolution (<0.2 m) multitemporal UAV orthoimages and DEMs at five of the glaciers in this study shows that 79% of the newly formed cliff area from 202 cliff formation events is related to the presence of streams or ponds, which indicates that these hydrological features directly influence ice cliff formation (Text S1 and Figure S2 in Supporting Information S1). Such association is further confirmed by field observations (Figure 2g-2i) at numerous sites for both the formation and persistence of ice cliffs (Anderson, Armstrong, Anderson, Scherler, & Petersen, 2021;Brun et al, 2016;Kneib et al, 2021;Mölg et al, 2020;Sato et al, 2021). This association between streams and cliffs or ponds and cliffs, and the decreasing density of cliffs with distance from these features (Figure 2a) leads us to define a 40 m-buffer around ponds and streams within which we classify the cliff pixels as pond-influenced or stream-influenced (Figure 2).…”
Section: Influence Of Supraglacial Hydrology On Ice Cliff Distributionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…While models accurately simulate the energy and mass balance contribution of individual ice cliffs (Buri et al., 2016; Kneib et al., 2022), their application at large spatial scales is limited by our understanding of the controls of ice cliff distribution. Indeed, estimates of ice cliff density are difficult to make (Anderson, Armstrong, Anderson, & Buri, 2021; Herreid & Pellicciotti, 2018; Kneib et al., 2020) and vary widely in time and space, between 1% and 15% of the debris‐covered area (e.g., Falaschi et al., 2021; Kneib et al., 2021; Loriaux & Ruiz, 2021; Sato et al., 2021; Steiner et al., 2019; Watson, Quincey, Smith, et al., 2017). Remote sensing studies have shown that cliffs are often associated with ponds (Steiner et al., 2019; Watson, Quincey, Carrivick, & Smith, 2017), hinting at a preferential location of ice cliffs where lower glacier longitudinal gradient and surface velocities promote surface ponding (Bolch et al., 2008; Quincey & Glasser, 2009; Quincey et al., 2007; Racoviteanu et al., 2021; Reynolds, 2000; Sakai & Fujita, 2010; Salerno et al., 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CC BY 4.0 License. (Immerzeel et al, 2014;Brun et al, 2018;Mölg et al, 2019;Anderson et al, 2021a;Kneib et al, 2021Kneib et al, , 2022Mishra et al, 2021;Sato et al, 2021). These studies confirm the potential for investigating glacier-or sub-glacierscale domains based on high-resolution data, which can provide detailed observations of local processes (e.g., Westoby et al, 2020).…”
mentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Both the catchment‐scale and glacier‐scale comparisons show a discrepancy between remote sensing inferred and modeled ablation patterns in the debris‐covered ablation zone, where the model shows less annual ablation than is inferred from the satellite‐derived estimates. Like the other main glaciers in the valley, Langtang Glacier has a heavily debris‐covered tongue with supraglacial ice cliffs and ponds (Kneib, Miles, Buri, et al., 2021; Kneib, Miles, Jola, et al., 2021; E. S. Miles et al., 2017; Steiner et al., 2019) which locally enhance glacier melt (Buri et al., 2021; E. S. Miles et al., 2018) and lead to increased glacier thinning rates in areas of high density of these features (Ragettli, Bolch, et al., 2016). The mass loss effects of cliffs and ponds on the glacier surface are not included in the model and are also not represented in the debris thickness.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%