2012
DOI: 10.1134/s0038094612020049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interannual variability of the solar constant

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to the Sun, this is a violent environment for the stability of any planet's atmosphere. The solar constant exhibits variability on the order of several parts per million (e.g., Froehlich 1987;Fedorov 2012), and the variability due to the Earth's noncircular orbit is on the scale of 6%, but over 6 months, not 2 days (Fedorov 2012). In the case of HR 8799, variability of the star is three orders of magnitude greater over a hundred times shorter timescale.…”
Section: Discussion: Planets Are Diversementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to the Sun, this is a violent environment for the stability of any planet's atmosphere. The solar constant exhibits variability on the order of several parts per million (e.g., Froehlich 1987;Fedorov 2012), and the variability due to the Earth's noncircular orbit is on the scale of 6%, but over 6 months, not 2 days (Fedorov 2012). In the case of HR 8799, variability of the star is three orders of magnitude greater over a hundred times shorter timescale.…”
Section: Discussion: Planets Are Diversementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The visible light photoreactor was composed of two dichroic lamps, fixed at 21 cm from the hair samples, with an irradiance of 2.0 W cm −2 . The average irradiance of the sunlight is 136.7 mW cm −2 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is especially relevant when someone is exposed to the sun at the beach, for example, since the radiant exposure can be quite significant. One hour of direct sun exposition presents a total radiant exposure of 492 J cm −2 , since the normal total surface irradiance of sunlight is 136.7 mW cm −2 . Indeed, 24.5 J cm −2 is the radiant exposure for the UV region for an exposure of 1 h at the beach (6.8 mW cm −2 irradiance), while it is 221.4 J cm −2 in the visible range (61.5 mW cm −2 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this question remains debatable (Beer et al, 2000;Foukal et al, 2006;Abdusamatov, 2007;Mackey, 2009: Kopp andLeun, 2011). Another reason is related to celestial mechanical processes (changes in the Earth-Sun dis tance) resulting from the orbital motion of the Earth being perturbed by the nearest celestial bodies (Borisenkov et al, 1985;Fedorov, 2012). During the unperturbed (keplerian) motion of the Earth, the insolation changes within the annual orbital motion of the Earth around the Sun with regular annual variation (maximum is in the perihelion, minimum is in the aphelion).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies for calculation of the Earth's insolation were started at A. I. Voeikov Main Geophysical Observa tory; however, there were no further developments (Borisenkov et al, 1983;1985). Currently, such studies are conducted at Lomonosov MSU (Fedorov, 2012;2013;2015). In this paper we assume the following notations for the components of interannual variabil ity of the Earth's insolation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%