2021
DOI: 10.1029/2020gc009588
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

InterCarb: A Community Effort to Improve Interlaboratory Standardization of the Carbonate Clumped Isotope Thermometer Using Carbonate Standards

Abstract: The exclusive use of carbonate reference materials is a robust method for the standardization of clumped isotope measurements • Measurements using different acid temperatures, designs of preparation lines, and mass spectrometers are statistically indistinguishable • We propose new consensus values for a set of 7 carbonate reference materials and updated guidelines to report clumped isotope measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

15
194
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 160 publications
(211 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
15
194
2
Order By: Relevance
“…agated Δ 47 errors may also be treated as Gaussian for all practical purposes. What is more, as reported by Bernasconi, Daëron et al (2021), using this framework yields a very reasonable (p = 0.19) prediction for the distribution of inter-laboratory scatter in Δ 47 values within the InterCarb data set.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…agated Δ 47 errors may also be treated as Gaussian for all practical purposes. What is more, as reported by Bernasconi, Daëron et al (2021), using this framework yields a very reasonable (p = 0.19) prediction for the distribution of inter-laboratory scatter in Δ 47 values within the InterCarb data set.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Because the relative contributions of the autogenic and allogenic error components defined above (Equations 11-13) are sensitive to the distribution of analyses among anchor and unknown samples and on the isotopic composition of unknowns relative to the anchor polygon, they are expected to vary greatly between laboratories and/or sessions. The InterCarb data set, comprising over five thousand analyses from 22 different laboratories (Bernasconi, Daëron, et al, 2021), offers an excellent opportunity to quantify these two components in a wide range of realistic settings. which plots within the anchor polygon defined in (δ 47 , Δ 47 ) space by ETH-1/2/3, are generally slightly smaller than autogenic errors, resulting in a modest increase of the total Δ 47 error (σ 47 ) relative to the autogenic error.…”
Section: Impact Of Standardization Errorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Δ 47 values for both the calibration and our samples were originally derived using values for ETH1-3 as published by Bernasconi et al (2018). However, thanks to a community-wide effort to improve inter-laboratory comparison, the accepted values for these standards have recently been updated (I-CDES scale; Bernasconi et al, 2021). Although measured prior to this recent advance, our Δ 47 data were fully recalculated using the updated standard values and reported on the I-CDES scale.…”
Section: Clumped Isotope Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This recalculated version of the calibration by Meinicke et al (2020) should be used instead of the original version (Meinicke et al, 2020, Equation 2) for future studies that are based on the I-CDES scale proposed by Bernasconi et al (2021).…”
Section: Clumped Isotope Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%