2014
DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncu202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intercomparison 2013 on measurements of the personal dose equivalent Hp(10) in photon fields in the African region

Abstract: An intercomparison exercise on the measurement of personal dose equivalent Hp(10) was jointly organised by the International Atomic Energy Agency and the Nuclear Research Centre of Algiers through its Secondary Standard Dosimetry Laboratory in the African region. This intercomparison exercise was aimed at verifying the performance of the individual monitoring services of the participants in order to assess their capabilities to measure the quantity Hp(10) in photon (gamma and X ray) fields helping them to comp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Generally, a good sensitivity of low energy X-rays between 20 and 250 kev is observed, however, the energy dependence is observed for these same x-ray beams or the relative response is between 0.97 and 1.47 compared to that of cesium (662 KeV) and cobalt (1250 Kev). This large difference in response is probably due to the dosimetric system which is not calibrated on X-ray and which does not use an appropriate dose algorithm incorporating the X-ray beam qualities for the evaluation of Hp (10) [16] An optimal operating value of the response is found at 80 kev. Nevertheless the relative response of photon energies to the normal incidence compared to the manufacturer [10] and the recommendations of [12] is satisfactory.…”
Section: Angular Dependencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, a good sensitivity of low energy X-rays between 20 and 250 kev is observed, however, the energy dependence is observed for these same x-ray beams or the relative response is between 0.97 and 1.47 compared to that of cesium (662 KeV) and cobalt (1250 Kev). This large difference in response is probably due to the dosimetric system which is not calibrated on X-ray and which does not use an appropriate dose algorithm incorporating the X-ray beam qualities for the evaluation of Hp (10) [16] An optimal operating value of the response is found at 80 kev. Nevertheless the relative response of photon energies to the normal incidence compared to the manufacturer [10] and the recommendations of [12] is satisfactory.…”
Section: Angular Dependencementioning
confidence: 99%