2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2012.02.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intercomparison of MODIS albedo retrievals and in situ measurements across the global FLUXNET network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
208
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 284 publications
(216 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
8
208
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The MODIS dataset (MCD43C3, other versions also exist) provides both black-sky and white-sky albedo. The MODIS albedo products have been shown to be stable and accurate in both radiometric and geolocation aspects (Cescatti et al, 2012;Wolfe et al, 2002), and the spatial resolution of MODIS is considerably better than AVHRR (GAC).…”
Section: Previous Long-term Surface Albedo Timeseriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The MODIS dataset (MCD43C3, other versions also exist) provides both black-sky and white-sky albedo. The MODIS albedo products have been shown to be stable and accurate in both radiometric and geolocation aspects (Cescatti et al, 2012;Wolfe et al, 2002), and the spatial resolution of MODIS is considerably better than AVHRR (GAC).…”
Section: Previous Long-term Surface Albedo Timeseriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MODIS albedo product and its validation efforts have been extensively described in the literature (e.g. Schaaf et al, 2002;Jin et al, 2003;Cescatti et al, 2012). To match the CLARA-SAL products to the MODIS 16-day albedo means, the following procedures were followed.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Dataset With Mcd43c3 Productsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The agreement is generally quite good for BSRN sites, with metrics that are comparable to MODIS-only albedo estimates [31,56] and generally better than AVHRR-only estimates [14,32]. The observed biases (MBD and MABD) are less than 0.05 at all BSRN sites, with no systematic tendencies for either over-or underestimation.…”
Section: Results From Demonstrator Dataset Evaluation Against Bsrn Anmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…With some sites, it is in good agreement, while others displayed a clear overestimation in SCM. Some differences against the FLUXNET data are similar than those from MODIS-only evaluations in the literature [56], yet the other results point towards the need for the further development of the atmospheric correction protocol and verification of the validity of the applied atmospheric composition inputs (AOD and water vapor).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation