2022
DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-1429968/v1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intercomparison of regional loss estimates from global synthetic tropical cyclone models

Abstract: Tropical cyclones (TCs) cause devastating damage to life and property. Historical TC data is scarce, complicating adequate TC risk assessments. Synthetic TC models are specifically designed to overcome this scarcity. While these models have been evaluated on their ability to simulate TC activity, no study to date has focused on the model performance and applicability in TC risk assessments. This study performs the first model intercomparison of four different global-scale synthetic TC datasets in the impact … Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The models from the intercomparison project of Meiler et al. (2022) each use different approaches to represent TC intensity. The MIT wind model is based upon the aforementioned CHIPS model.…”
Section: Event Setsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The models from the intercomparison project of Meiler et al. (2022) each use different approaches to represent TC intensity. The MIT wind model is based upon the aforementioned CHIPS model.…”
Section: Event Setsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But as Meiler et al. (2022) remark, post‐processing CHAZ's frequency of events is still required. In our paper, we borrow the MIT approach to generate a fixed number of storms in the event set production (left‐hand side of Figure 1), whereas we use a typical count distribution to generate consistent seasonal frequency (right‐hand side of Figure 1).…”
Section: Annual Catalogsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Code to reproduce the results of this paper is available at a GitHub repository with the identifier https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6782091 67 .…”
Section: Data Availabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%