2020
DOI: 10.1061/ajrua6.0001043
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interdependencies in Seismic Risk Assessment of Seaport Systems: Case Study at Largest Commercial Port in Italy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study exclusively considers the highlighted terminals in Figure 2 used for container operations, in line with Conca et al (2020). Each port terminal represents a subsystem of the port and is composed of waterfront structures (wharves), operating cranes, and the electric power system, which is represented in this study as an electric cabin (i.e., substation).…”
Section: Case Study Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This study exclusively considers the highlighted terminals in Figure 2 used for container operations, in line with Conca et al (2020). Each port terminal represents a subsystem of the port and is composed of waterfront structures (wharves), operating cranes, and the electric power system, which is represented in this study as an electric cabin (i.e., substation).…”
Section: Case Study Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…decision-making algorithms and a seismic risk assessment methodology for port systems, within a novel harmonized framework. The DSS specifically combine/unifies: (1) the framework of Performance-Based Earthquake Early Warning, or PBEEW [18,19,20], which uses a probabilistic, engineering-based risk model to determine whether EEW alerts are triggered; (2) a simulation-based risk assessment methodology, proposed by Conca et al [21], that generates damage and loss scenarios accounting for the systemic vulnerability of the multi-component port system and its interdependent functionality; and (3) a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) algorithm [22], that builds on the engineering-oriented consequence predictions and was previously applied to a EEW DSS by Cremen and Galasso [7]. The purpose of the MCDM component is to account for the risk preferences/priorities of stakeholders across various dimensions of risk that do not necessarily need to be measured in a consistent unit.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the latter case, the deformation of the quay walls, because of their sheer size and weight, may potentially put cranes out of balance, increasing the risk of their collapse. In this context, Conca et al [11] recently investigated the effect of interdependencies in a seismic risk analysis of ports. They compared the results for specific seismic scenarios obtained in the assessment of the seismic vulnerability of the seaport, considering and neglecting the interactions among its components, and they found that the modeling of the port system without considering interdependencies led to less conservative results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%