1992
DOI: 10.1113/expphysiol.1992.sp003636
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interdigestive gastric blood flow: the relation to motor and secretory activities in conscious dogs

Abstract: SUMMARYBlood flow in the left gastric artery was measured with an electromagnetic flowmeter in nine conscious beagle dogs. In the fasting state gastric motility and secretion exhibited periodical changes with an average cycle interval of 115-4+9-7 min. During a quiescent period, when gastric motility and secretion were minimal, the mean blood flow was stable at 33 9 + 3-8 ml/min. During the contracting phase each peristaltic contraction was coupled with a rapid fall and rise in blood flow (from 10 5 + 1 9 ml/m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, systemic administration of OT transiently increased BP. This result was consistent with the report of Costa et al 15 Although the gut circulation influences the GI motility, 16 we believe that the transient decrease and subsequent increase of the gastric pressure were caused by the indirect and direct effect of OT not due to the change of gastric blood flow. First of all, devazepide, the specific CCK 1 receptor antagonist, abolished the early transient decrease of gastric motility but did not influence the increase of BP (data not shown) following OT administration.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In this study, systemic administration of OT transiently increased BP. This result was consistent with the report of Costa et al 15 Although the gut circulation influences the GI motility, 16 we believe that the transient decrease and subsequent increase of the gastric pressure were caused by the indirect and direct effect of OT not due to the change of gastric blood flow. First of all, devazepide, the specific CCK 1 receptor antagonist, abolished the early transient decrease of gastric motility but did not influence the increase of BP (data not shown) following OT administration.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…While the postprandial hyperemia in the intestine is well characterized, there is a relative paucity of studies on the gastric vascular response to meals. Typically, a transient gastric hyperemia is noted at 10 to 45 min after a meal in conscious dogs and cats (52,250,347,433). However, in one study only 50% of the animals responded with a gastric hyperemia after feeding (145) while a postprandial hyperemia was not detected in another study (12).…”
Section: Stomach Postprandial Hyperemiamentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In fasting conscious dogs, periodic gastric contractile activity is associated with biphasic changes in blood flow; reduced flow during the contraction phase and increased flow during muscle relaxation (347). The hyperemia noted during relaxation exceeds the nadir in blood flow during contraction, such that average blood flow is increased during periods of enhanced motility.…”
Section: Stomach Postprandial Hyperemiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The blood flow in the gastroduodenal artery (just above the branch of the superior pancreaticoduodenal artery), measured by Doppler flow probe, is approximately 10 ml min-' in anaesthetized 8-10 kg piglets (S. G. Pierzynowski & P. Kiela, unpublished observation). The blood flow opposing the infusion reaching tlhe superior pancreaticoduodenal artery is likely to be even greater in conscious pigs since halothane anaesthesia reduces mesenteric blood flow and cardiac output in pigs by about 50% (Loick, Tokyay, Abdi, Traber, Nichols & Herndon, 1991) and, indeed, flows of some 30-60 ml min-' have been recorded in the left gastric artery in conscious, fasted dogs of (Naruse, Takagi, Kato & Ozaki, 1992). Therefore, our observations that the infusion of Evans Blue into anaesthetized pigs, via the same route and at the same rate (1 ml min-') as for peptide infusions in the conscious pig, stained the pylorus and proximal duodenum only, and not the pancreas, strongly suggests that the stimulatory effect of these two peptides arose from an action in the duodenum and was not due to the infusions reaching the pancreas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%