The aim of this paper is to describe and to reflect on the experience of the authors in setting up a new model of learning environment in management education in a University in Brazil, which was initially called Management Practice Laboratory (MPL). The MPL environment was conceived as a physical and conceptual space where students could learn and practice the principles and techniques of working in organizations in its three levels: operational, tactical, and strategic. The foundations of the project come from social constructivist perspective on learning, from experiential learning literature and from researches that call for a new epistemological ground in management learning. In this paper, the authors will stress some challenges and frustrations with the project since these could be helpful to those interested in similar initiatives. Due to limited space, only two challenges will be stressed: (1) the construction of legitimacy for the project; and (2) the persistent dissonance between theory and practice. The authors conclude that there is room for innovation in the way management is taught and learned in universities since one shows courage to overcome the challenges and frustrations one will certainly deal with.Keywords: learning environments, management education, simulations, practice laboratory, experiential learning, learning by doing
IntroductionWith every mistake we must surely be learning. The authors define the learning environment as a holistic, physical, and conceptual environment to learn and practise useful skills in the three levels of organisations: the operational, the tactical, and the strategic. They believed that such learning environment would improve students' attitudes not only as professionals, but also personally, as team members and citizens. As it will be made clear throughout the text, their believes are advocated in a passionate way.The model was conceived-as it will be described-as a two layer environment: (1) at one level, as a physical site, a space; and (2) at another level, as a conceptual framework, which was considered to be a virtual country. As a physical site, the project was understood not only as a facility where students would attend and practise skills, but also as "a product and a precondition of all our practices and engagements… to the construction of the relations between us, and to the blossoming, or not, of identities" (Massey, 2004, p.