2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.mssp.2017.10.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interface and transport properties of gamma irradiated Au/n-GaP Schottky diode

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This behavior became more prominent for the sample with a 7.4-nm-thick AlN. The increase in conductance with increasing the frequency was associated with the recombination centers promoting recombination current in the depletion region and the interface states providing charging and discharging current or hopping conduction process occurring at high frequency [ 32 ]. The results, therefore, indicate that interface states with various time constants are present for all the samples, and the presence of such defects are most significant for the sample with a 7.4-nm-thick AlN.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This behavior became more prominent for the sample with a 7.4-nm-thick AlN. The increase in conductance with increasing the frequency was associated with the recombination centers promoting recombination current in the depletion region and the interface states providing charging and discharging current or hopping conduction process occurring at high frequency [ 32 ]. The results, therefore, indicate that interface states with various time constants are present for all the samples, and the presence of such defects are most significant for the sample with a 7.4-nm-thick AlN.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ideality factor and the Schottky barrier height are main parameters for gate-ch of InP-based HEMTs. According to the thermionic-emission model, the ideality factor and the Schottky barrier height can be obtained from the slope and intercept of Ln I-V plot, the equations can be written as: [23][24][25] ,…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Φ B had a little change for both devices. The interface states introduced by electron irradiation could be considered to be the reason for the change of n [24,25]. with different gate width before and after electron irradiation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following supporting information can be downloaded at : Figure S1: Schematic of an enclosure that was used during the MW-PECVD process to prevent direct plasma effects; Figure S2: AFM image (a), AFM phase image (b), and height profile (c) of A1 sample; Figure S3: AFM image (a), AFM phase image (b), and height profile (c) of A7 sample; Figure S4: AFM image (a), AFM phase image (b), and height profile (c) of A8 sample; Figure S5: AFM image (a), AFM phase image (b), and height profile (c) of A11 sample; Figure S6: AFM image (a), AFM phase image (b), and height profile (c) of B1 sample; Figure S7: AFM image (a), AFM phase image (b), and height profile (c) of B2 sample; Figure S8: AFM image (a), AFM phase image (b), and height profile (c) of B3 sample; Figure S9: AFM image (a), AFM phase image (b), and height profile (c) of C2 sample; Figure S10: AFM image (a), AFM phase image (b), and height profile (c) of C3 sample; Figure S11: FWHMG vs. ID/IG (a) and FWHMG vs. PosG (b) plots; Figure S12: I-V characteristic parameters: (a,d) IR(0.3 V); (b,e) IR(0.1 V)/IF(0.1 V); (c,f) IR(0.3 V)/IF(0.3 V); in relation with (a-c) I2D/IG; (d-f) ID/IG; Figure S13: I-V characteristic parameters: (a) IR(0.3 V); (b) IR(0.3 V)/IF(0.3 V) in relation with surface roughness; Figure S14: ISC vs. ID/IG (a) and UOC vs. ID/IG (b) plots showing a difference between devices measured at 800 nm illumination (solid) and 406 nm illumination (hollow); Figure S15: UOC vs. PosG plot; Figure S16: ISC (a,c) and UOC (b,d) relation with respect to ID/IG (a,b) and FWHM2D (c,d) under 800 nm illumination; Figure S17: ISC (a) and UOC (b) and sample roughness relation under 800 nm illumination; Figure S18: Diode I-V and UOC (at 800 nm illumination) relation; Figure S19: Different charge transport mechanisms estimated from typical fabricated diode I-V graphs under various thermal conditions: (a) Poole–Frenkel mechanism; (b) Image-force-induced charge transport; (c) Thermionic emission; Figure S20: Diode operating regimes in terms of temperature: (a) typical I-V characteristics measured in the dark at different temperatures (253–313 K); (b) The Arrhenius plot; (c) ln(σ/T2) vs. 1000/T plot; Table S1: Summarized benchmark showing PCE values and PCE enhancement techniques of the CVD-synthesized graphene/Si solar cells investigated by different research groups; Table S2: Probable doping and strain effects governing main graphene’s Raman peak (G, 2D) positions and their FWHM; Table S3: Hydrogen plasma pre-treatment effects on Si(100) substrate surface. References [ 115 , 116 , 117 , 118 , 119 , 120 , 121 , 122 , 123 , 124 , 125 ] are cited in the Supplementary Materials.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%