“…The following supporting information can be downloaded at : Figure S1: Schematic of an enclosure that was used during the MW-PECVD process to prevent direct plasma effects; Figure S2: AFM image (a), AFM phase image (b), and height profile (c) of A1 sample; Figure S3: AFM image (a), AFM phase image (b), and height profile (c) of A7 sample; Figure S4: AFM image (a), AFM phase image (b), and height profile (c) of A8 sample; Figure S5: AFM image (a), AFM phase image (b), and height profile (c) of A11 sample; Figure S6: AFM image (a), AFM phase image (b), and height profile (c) of B1 sample; Figure S7: AFM image (a), AFM phase image (b), and height profile (c) of B2 sample; Figure S8: AFM image (a), AFM phase image (b), and height profile (c) of B3 sample; Figure S9: AFM image (a), AFM phase image (b), and height profile (c) of C2 sample; Figure S10: AFM image (a), AFM phase image (b), and height profile (c) of C3 sample; Figure S11: FWHMG vs. ID/IG (a) and FWHMG vs. PosG (b) plots; Figure S12: I-V characteristic parameters: (a,d) IR(0.3 V); (b,e) IR(0.1 V)/IF(0.1 V); (c,f) IR(0.3 V)/IF(0.3 V); in relation with (a-c) I2D/IG; (d-f) ID/IG; Figure S13: I-V characteristic parameters: (a) IR(0.3 V); (b) IR(0.3 V)/IF(0.3 V) in relation with surface roughness; Figure S14: ISC vs. ID/IG (a) and UOC vs. ID/IG (b) plots showing a difference between devices measured at 800 nm illumination (solid) and 406 nm illumination (hollow); Figure S15: UOC vs. PosG plot; Figure S16: ISC (a,c) and UOC (b,d) relation with respect to ID/IG (a,b) and FWHM2D (c,d) under 800 nm illumination; Figure S17: ISC (a) and UOC (b) and sample roughness relation under 800 nm illumination; Figure S18: Diode I-V and UOC (at 800 nm illumination) relation; Figure S19: Different charge transport mechanisms estimated from typical fabricated diode I-V graphs under various thermal conditions: (a) Poole–Frenkel mechanism; (b) Image-force-induced charge transport; (c) Thermionic emission; Figure S20: Diode operating regimes in terms of temperature: (a) typical I-V characteristics measured in the dark at different temperatures (253–313 K); (b) The Arrhenius plot; (c) ln(σ/T2) vs. 1000/T plot; Table S1: Summarized benchmark showing PCE values and PCE enhancement techniques of the CVD-synthesized graphene/Si solar cells investigated by different research groups; Table S2: Probable doping and strain effects governing main graphene’s Raman peak (G, 2D) positions and their FWHM; Table S3: Hydrogen plasma pre-treatment effects on Si(100) substrate surface. References [ 115 , 116 , 117 , 118 , 119 , 120 , 121 , 122 , 123 , 124 , 125 ] are cited in the Supplementary Materials.…”