2019
DOI: 10.1002/qua.26103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interface configuration effects on excitation, exciton dissociation, and charge recombination in organic photovoltaic heterojunction

Abstract: The morphology of donor‐acceptor heterojunction interface significantly affects the electron/hole processes in organic solar cells, including charge transfer (CT), exciton dissociation (ED), and charge recombination (CR). Here, to investigate interface molecular configuration effects, the donor‐acceptor complexes with face‐on, edge‐on, and end‐on configurations were constructed as model systems for the p‐SIDT(FBTTh2)2/C60 heterojunction. The geometries, electronic structures, and excitation properties of monom… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 104 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The details of calculating rate constants of electron processes in OPVs have been reported in our previous work. 41,50…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The details of calculating rate constants of electron processes in OPVs have been reported in our previous work. 41,50…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Donor–acceptor systems with low energy offset and high photoluminescence show improved performance for high-open-circuit-voltage OSCs 58 , 59 . Our results exhibit that efficient electron-withdrawing terminal units with a prolonged conjugation lower the bandgap and allowed the IBRD1–IBRD6 molecules to exhibit smaller excitation energies than IBR, with greater absorption spectra in the visible region (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In actuality, the quantity E HOMO + ∑ i LHE i p i Δ E i means the weighted average of the electron energy after photon absorption. In organic solar cells, V OC–loss is usually divided into radiative and nonradiative parts and is approximated as 0.6 ± 0.1 V. For DSSCs, V OC–loss has not yet been systematically studied and was not taken into account in previous calculations. The weight p i is the normalized relative transition probability of the i th excited state, where ω i is the i th excited state transition probability of the studied system, the summation is run over all excited states, and ω i (normalization) is the i th excited state transition probability of the normalized system in order to compare the relative transition probability of a set of dye sensitizers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%