2017
DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b02621
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interface-Confined Doubly Anisotropic Oxidation of Two-Dimensional MoS2

Abstract: Despite their importance, chemical reactions confined in a low dimensional space are elusive and experimentally intractable. In this work, we report doubly anisotropic, in-plane and out-of-plane, oxidation reactions of two-dimensional crystals, by resolving interface-confined thermal oxidation of a single and multilayer MoS supported on silica substrates from their conventional surface reaction. Using optical second-harmonic generation spectroscopy of artificially stacked multilayers, we directly proved that c… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
35
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4d), which is consistent with the negligible reaction in Fig. 4d considering that the threshold temperature for thermal oxidation is above 300 o C. [36][37][38] When the average power was raised to 11 mW for which i σ reached its maximum (Fig. 4c), opt T reached 320 o C where thermal oxidation readily occurs.…”
Section: Confirmation Of Photothermal Mechanism By Raman Thermometrysupporting
confidence: 85%
“…4d), which is consistent with the negligible reaction in Fig. 4d considering that the threshold temperature for thermal oxidation is above 300 o C. [36][37][38] When the average power was raised to 11 mW for which i σ reached its maximum (Fig. 4c), opt T reached 320 o C where thermal oxidation readily occurs.…”
Section: Confirmation Of Photothermal Mechanism By Raman Thermometrysupporting
confidence: 85%
“…This is consistent with the low-temperature surface oxidation of MoS 2 , which is initiated at ~100 °C and significantly increases at 300 °C 26 , resulting in the negative impact of oxygen adsorption on the mobility and homogeneity of MoS 2 /G heterostructure devices after annealing above 150 °C 27 . We hypothesize two possible interfacial oxidation mechanisms responsible for the weaker interaction of MoS 2 /hBN(G) at 300 °C: (1) replacement of sulfur atoms with oxygen atoms results in a lower surface energy in the oxidized MoS 2 (MoO 3 ) than unreacted MoS 2 ; (2) partial protrusions (0.36 ± 0.25 nm 28 ) at the interface due to formation of interfacial MoO 3 patches along with the presence of gaseous reaction products (e.g., SO 2 , which cannot diffuse out of interface owing to very high vdW pressure on the trapped molecular layers 29 ) can give rise to local interlayer decoupling of unreacted MoS 2 crystal from underlying hBN and G substrates.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To investigate the presence of Mo oxides on the MoS 2 crystals, we prepared single 2H MoS 2 crystals on silicon/silica substrates, as explained in the Materials and Methods. We have studied flakes thicker than 10 nm, i.e., of more than 15 MoS 2 monolayers due to known dependencies of several physico-chemical properties of the MoS 2 flakes on their thickness, particularly for the flakes thinner than 10 monolayers [ 27 ]. First, the MoS 2 flakes were localized using light microscopy and AFM; see Figure 1 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%