2009
DOI: 10.1002/nme.2600
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interface handling for three‐dimensional higher‐order XFEM‐computations in fluid–structure interaction

Abstract: Three-dimensional higher-order eXtended finite element method (XFEM)-computations still pose challenging computational geometry problems especially for moving interfaces. This paper provides a method for the localization of a higher-order interface finite element (FE) mesh in an underlying three-dimensional higher-order FE mesh. Additionally, it demonstrates, how a subtetrahedralization of an intersected element can be obtained, which preserves the possibly curved interface and allows therefore exact numerical… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The principle idea of XFEM is shown in Figure 11, simplified for a crack in one dimension. Though XFEM has originally been developed for fracture, it has been extended to numerous applications including two-phase flow [122,123], fluid-structure interaction [124,125], biomechanics [126], inverse problems [127,128], multifield problems [129][130][131][132], among others. XFEM has been incorporated meanwhile into commercial software (XFEM) and has become one of the most popular methods for fracture.…”
Section: Extended Finite Element Methods (Xfem)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The principle idea of XFEM is shown in Figure 11, simplified for a crack in one dimension. Though XFEM has originally been developed for fracture, it has been extended to numerous applications including two-phase flow [122,123], fluid-structure interaction [124,125], biomechanics [126], inverse problems [127,128], multifield problems [129][130][131][132], among others. XFEM has been incorporated meanwhile into commercial software (XFEM) and has become one of the most popular methods for fracture.…”
Section: Extended Finite Element Methods (Xfem)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, no global level-set functions or analytic functions are required. Subsequently, we apply a subdivision into tetrahedrons for domain integrals and triangles for boundary integrals [29] to accurately integrate the weak form in intersected elements. This integration cell technique is applicable to low-and high-order FEs and high-order interface approximations.…”
Section: Xfem Formulation For Background Fluidmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interface is localized by the surface mesh of the embedded fluid patch. With the help of parallel search trees [29], first all intersected elements are determined. The relative position to the interface, which is required to evaluate the Heaviside function Equation (42), is obtained via the normal vector of the surface patch elements.…”
Section: Xfem Formulation For Background Fluidmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our approach, we use linear sub-elements (finer mesh) incorporated into a boundary element E B to control a priori the faithfulness of the boundary representation. This approach was also used with boundaries represented by an analytical level set in 2D [40] and explicit 3D polygonal mesh in [43,44]. Following ideas similar to the Heaviside step function approach of [9,36], we will define the indicator functions K I[B and N B to simplify the description of the domain X h and its boundary C h , respectively, as follows:…”
Section: Numerical Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Explicit surface representations independent of the mesh for 3D crack growth with hp-GFEM and interfaces in fluid-structure interaction with higher-order XFEM have been presented in the works of Pereira et al [43] and Mayer et al [44], respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%