2011
DOI: 10.1002/pssa.201127592
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interface properties of OFETs based on an air‐stable n‐channel perylene tetracarboxylic diimide semiconductor

Abstract: In this study, several experimental techniques were employed to gain insights into the molecular interactions at the interfaces in organic field-effect transistors (OFETs). A self-assembled monolayer (SAM) was applied to the gate insulator to influence the interactions at the interface. Macroscopic electrical measurements, microscopic potentiometry, absorption/luminescence spectroscopy, and ellipsometry are combined to study top-contact OFETs based on an air-stable n-channel perylene derivative. They show clea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Figure 6 measured and simulated potential profiles are shown for the single-spin device at V DS = 3 V and at the various gate biases: V GS = 0 V and V GS = 5 V. It has been suggested in the literature that a lower surface potential through the channel for organic field-effect transistors indicates a lower mobility in the device. 39 Applying a gate bias introduces more carriers into the channel, thus increasing the conductivity of the In 2 O 3 channel.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Figure 6 measured and simulated potential profiles are shown for the single-spin device at V DS = 3 V and at the various gate biases: V GS = 0 V and V GS = 5 V. It has been suggested in the literature that a lower surface potential through the channel for organic field-effect transistors indicates a lower mobility in the device. 39 Applying a gate bias introduces more carriers into the channel, thus increasing the conductivity of the In 2 O 3 channel.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[22,25,26,38,39] Furthermore, all of these studies utilize bottom-gate top-contact (BG-TC) OTFT architectures and, therefore, may not completely eliminate the influence of OSC ordering and morphology on R C . Worldwide research has led to remarkable improvements in OTFT operating parameters, with dielectric and R C is rarely considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the relationship between the dielectric and R C is rarely considered. At the time of writing, there are only a few studies that either mention or explore how the dielectric impacts R C in OTFTs . Furthermore, all of these studies utilize bottom‐gate top‐contact (BG‐TC) OTFT architectures and, therefore, may not completely eliminate the influence of OSC ordering and morphology on R C .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the electrical potential distribution is of particular interest for applications such as organic solar cells and organic field effect transistors (OFETs) (Palermo et al ., ), KPFM‐AM has also been extensively applied to characterise organic semiconductor‐based devices (Bürgi et al ., ; Nichols et al ., ; Puntambekar et al ., ; Bürgi et al ., ; Tal et al ., ) in order to investigate transport mechanisms and injection issues in OFETs. As the bottom‐contact structure is suited for potential measurements related to the channel charge distribution, KPFM‐AM imaging has been performed on various types of organic thin film devices based on pentacene (Hallam et al ., ; Nakamura et al ., ; Yogev et al ., ; Yogev et al ., ; Li et al ., ,b; Celle et al ., ; Wu et al ., ; Yogev & Rosenwaks, ), poly(3‐hexylthiophene) (P3HT) (Bürgi et al ., ; Liscio et al ., ; Kehrer et al ., ; Musumeci et al ., ), perylene (Luttich et al ., ) or oligothiopene (Afsharimani & Nysten, ). KPFM also facilitates the characterisation of the carrier injection process at electrode/organic semiconductor interfaces by measuring an injection potential drop (Bürgi et al ., ; Simonetti et al ., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%