2007
DOI: 10.1163/156855407782106447
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interfacial adhesion in fully and partially biodegradable polymer composites examined with microdroplet test and acoustic emission

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The failure rate of the fibres by breaking rather than pulling out of the resin was high. Czigány et al [14] have pointed out the inherent drawback of using this method for natural fibres. Since the resin drop is placed on the fibre without any pressure, the resin enters the voids in the elementary fibres to a smaller extent than when the resin impregnates the fibres in compression moulding pressure.…”
Section: Interfacial Shear Strength Of Hemp/polyestermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The failure rate of the fibres by breaking rather than pulling out of the resin was high. Czigány et al [14] have pointed out the inherent drawback of using this method for natural fibres. Since the resin drop is placed on the fibre without any pressure, the resin enters the voids in the elementary fibres to a smaller extent than when the resin impregnates the fibres in compression moulding pressure.…”
Section: Interfacial Shear Strength Of Hemp/polyestermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This value of interfacial shear strength is consistent with the value reported by other authors for natural fibres in polymer matrix. Czigány et al [14] determined the interfacial shear strength of hemp fibre (mean diameter 113 m) in polypropylene to be 5.1 ± 1.4 MPa, in biodegradable MaterBi polymer to be 2.9 ± 0.9 MPa, and in biodegradable PuraSorb polymer to be 11.3 ± 3.4 MPa. Baltazar-y-Jimenez et al [30] reported interfacial shear strength of 8.4 ± 1.8 MPa for hemp fibres in cellulose-acetate-butyrate matrix.…”
Section: Interfacial Shearmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, this improvement of the IFSS is related to the increase in the surface roughness caused by the removal of the waxy layers and other components on the surface of the fiber, which consequently improves the compatibility between the fibers and the matrix. From the figure it is noticed that an excess of treatment deteriorates the IFSS, this can be explained by the degradation of the fibers [44][45][46].…”
Section: Single Fiber Pull Outmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The embedded length of fiber was measured with a traveling microscope and an estimate made of the fiber diameter/cross‐sectional area with a microscope. This method has several inherent drawbacks for natural fibers, as pointed out by Czigany et al and results showed the large scatter typical of data of this type from natural fibers. For example, this technique does not use any raised pressures as normally associated with hand layup and molding of plaques, so that resin would not enter voids or small cavities as would normally occur during laminate consolidation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%