2000
DOI: 10.1021/la0003692
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interfacial Composition of Gemini Surfactant Micelles Determined by Chemical Trapping

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

20
61
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
20
61
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The calculated values of α are listed in Table 1. It is seen that, as originally found (4) and in agreement with the results of the chemical trapping method (42), α increases with the spacer carbon number, but much less than originally reported (4). The values of G…”
Section: Thermodynamics Of Micellization Of 12-s-12 Surfactantssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The calculated values of α are listed in Table 1. It is seen that, as originally found (4) and in agreement with the results of the chemical trapping method (42), α increases with the spacer carbon number, but much less than originally reported (4). The values of G…”
Section: Thermodynamics Of Micellization Of 12-s-12 Surfactantssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The reports of temperature dependence of cmc are scarce. Such a report on 12-s-12 (s = 2, 3, 4) is available in the literature [28]. The cmc values increased with temperature for the three surfactants studied, which is in good agreement with our results.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Both DTAB and 12-4-12 gave a value of 0.30, which is a normal value for an ionic surfactant in Millipore water. We [24] and others [25][26][27] have previously reported lower a-values for 12-2-12 and 12-3-12, i.e., geminis with shorter linking units than the one we are studying here. Evidently a C4 spacer is long enough to allow the same degree of micelle ionization as for micelles composed of monomeric surfactants of the same hydrocarbon tail length and the same type of polar head group.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 52%