1992
DOI: 10.1016/0921-5093(92)90399-l
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interfacial debonding and fiber pull-out stresses of fiber-reinforced composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The condition of interfacial debonding during push-out has been defined using two criteria: the shear strength criterion [17][18][19] and the critical energy release rate criterion [20][21][22][23]. In the strength-based approach, which is adopted in this study, it is assumed that interfacial debonding occurs when the maximum interfacial shear stress reaches the interfacial shear strength.…”
Section: Interfacial Debond Shear Strengthmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The condition of interfacial debonding during push-out has been defined using two criteria: the shear strength criterion [17][18][19] and the critical energy release rate criterion [20][21][22][23]. In the strength-based approach, which is adopted in this study, it is assumed that interfacial debonding occurs when the maximum interfacial shear stress reaches the interfacial shear strength.…”
Section: Interfacial Debond Shear Strengthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to this test method, the inner phase is pushed-out from the outer phase using a hard flat-bottomed punch and a universal testing machine. Parallel to the development of experimental methods and techniques to evaluate the interfacial properties, several numerical analyses have been developed and their applicability has been proven [9,[17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interfacial shear is related to the embedded length leading to the pull‐out phenomenon according to Eqn (2) τmax=ταletanh(αle)with α and the value of the IFSS τ max being two constants that are characteristics of the considered fiber‐matrix interface. α is related to the Young modulus of the fiber E f , the shear modulus of the matrix G i and the thickness of the interphase that transfers the stress from the matrix to the fiber b i according to Eqn (3) α2=2GibirEfOther more advanced models have been published by Lawrence, Chua and Piggott, Zhandarov et al ., Zhandarov and Pisanova and Hsueh . Nevertheless, Désarmot and Favre used several models to fit experimental data and showed that even if the Greszczuk's model was developed with the simplest hypothesis, it was also the one that fitted their data the best.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During straining the composite material reinforced with textile structures, macro-cracks are formed and propagated through the composites in which the bonding state at the interface is known for transferring the externally applied stresses from the matrix to the reinforcements [27]. As a matter of crack growth resistance, filament bridging and pull-out are major powerful energy dissipation mechanisms in composites materials [28,29]. They are directly correlated to the interfacial bonding between the filaments and the surrounding matrix.…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%