2002
DOI: 10.1088/0953-8984/15/1/332
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interfacial dynamics and the static profile near a single wall in a model colloid polymer mixture

Abstract: We report measurements on gas–liquid phase-separating colloid–polymer mixtures. A horizontally placed optical microscope with long-working-distance objectives enables us to see effects of gravity on phase separation kinetics and hence see the complete phase separation from beginning to end. Furthermore, the static profile near a single wall is analysed giving surface tensions in good agreement with scaling predictions as well as results from another experimental technique. The contact angle remains, however, i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
122
4

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(138 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
12
122
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The interfacial tensions decrease in the case of excluded volume interactions with respect to the AOV model. The comparison between our results and the experiments of Aarts et al 21 is quantitatively better than the results of the AOV model, although de Hoog and Lekkerkerker 12 show that it is difficult to obtain accurate interfacial tension measurements. In addition, we compare our results with the predictions of the extended free volume theory plus a square gradient approximation to evaluate the tension 45 and the DFT of Moncho-Jorda et al 47 The DFT uses effective one-component pair potentials between the colloids that include the excluded volume interaction according to the approach of Louis et al 46 The predictions of the two theories are very close to each other and to our simulation results.…”
Section: A Bulk Phase Behavior and Gas-liquid Interfacial Tensioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…The interfacial tensions decrease in the case of excluded volume interactions with respect to the AOV model. The comparison between our results and the experiments of Aarts et al 21 is quantitatively better than the results of the AOV model, although de Hoog and Lekkerkerker 12 show that it is difficult to obtain accurate interfacial tension measurements. In addition, we compare our results with the predictions of the extended free volume theory plus a square gradient approximation to evaluate the tension 45 and the DFT of Moncho-Jorda et al 47 The DFT uses effective one-component pair potentials between the colloids that include the excluded volume interaction according to the approach of Louis et al 46 The predictions of the two theories are very close to each other and to our simulation results.…”
Section: A Bulk Phase Behavior and Gas-liquid Interfacial Tensioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…Since the experimental parameters can be tailored to match the desired properties, such systems have become an important tool in investigating various theoretical concepts. Recent experiments on well-characterized colloid-polymer mixtures have involved studies of the wetting transition [3,4], real space observation of the thermal capillary waves [5], the fluid-fluid interfacial tension [6,7,8,9], and the interfacial width [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use here two different mixtures consisting of poly(methyl methacrylate) colloids with d 142 nm mixed with polystyrene polymers in decalin (system S1) and silica colloids with d 26 nm mixed with poly(dimethylsiloxane) polymers in cyclohexane (system S2). Both systems have been extensively characterized elsewhere [15][16][17]. We measured the gas-liquid surface tension by analyzing the capillary rise against a glass wall (S1 and S2) [16,17] and the capillary wave spectrum (S1) [15,17].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both systems have been extensively characterized elsewhere [15][16][17]. We measured the gas-liquid surface tension by analyzing the capillary rise against a glass wall (S1 and S2) [16,17] and the capillary wave spectrum (S1) [15,17]. The measured tension is 20 (S1) and 500 nN=m (S2) for the two mixtures considered here, i.e., 5-6 orders of magnitude smaller than for water ( 0:072 N=m).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%