2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2011.08.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interfacial indentation test of FeB/Fe2B coatings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The calculated hardness of FeB (26.25 GPa) and Fe 2 B (18.34 GPa) are in fairly good agreement with the experimental values of (20.4 ± 0.017 GPa) for Fe 2 B and (16.2 ± 0.011 GPa) for FeB [43]. The disagreement can be explained by the fact that experimentally measured values of hardness of materials are very sensitive to many parameters including loading and unloading speed, applied load, anisotropy of materials, defects in the sample, method of measurement, temperature, etc.…”
Section: Speciessupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The calculated hardness of FeB (26.25 GPa) and Fe 2 B (18.34 GPa) are in fairly good agreement with the experimental values of (20.4 ± 0.017 GPa) for Fe 2 B and (16.2 ± 0.011 GPa) for FeB [43]. The disagreement can be explained by the fact that experimentally measured values of hardness of materials are very sensitive to many parameters including loading and unloading speed, applied load, anisotropy of materials, defects in the sample, method of measurement, temperature, etc.…”
Section: Speciessupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The results can be explained by considering the following: during cooling, the shrinkage of the substrate prevails in the system, which submits the Fe 2 B phase (7.85 × 10 -6 °C -1 ) to compressive stresses since the coefficient of thermal expansion of the substrate is greater (18 × 10 -6 °C -1 ). The same applies between the FeB and Fe 2 B phase, where the thermal expansion coefficient of the former is 23 × 10 -6 °C -1 , resulting in a selft-equilibrating stress state 23 . In fact, the residual stresses in coating are mainly caused by lattice spacing and thermal expansion mismatch between the coating and substrate 13 .…”
Section: Berkovich Depth-sensing Indentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, to reduce the stress on CoB-Co2B bilayer, Delgado-Brito, et al [13] performed a diffusion annealing process (DAP) to estimate the indentation properties of a Co2B layer using the sensed microindentation fracture toughness Vickers test, obtaining new Kc results for the single-phase layer. On the other hand, Campos-Silva, et al [14] performed interfacial microindentation tests using a Vickers-type indenter to estimate the adhesion of the coating of the FeB-Fe2B bilayer generated on the surface of the borided AISI 316L alloy. The load applied, Young's modulus, hardness, and lateral longitude of the cracks generated, alongside the thickness of the FeB layer, were used to estimate the tenacity to apparent fracture and interphase adhesion of the FeB-Fe2B bi-phase layer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%