2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2017.03.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interfacial structure evolution of the growing composite precipitates in Al-Cu-Li alloys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although θ precipitates in Al-Cu alloy have a large aspect ratio, this geometric feature may be changed by the addition of alloying elements which modify the interfacial energy between the Al matrix and the precipitate (Mitlin et al, 2000;Yang et al, 2016;Duan et al, 2017). Thus, it is interesting to analyze the influence of the precipitate aspect ratio on the mechanisms of dislocation-precipitate interaction in the presence of the SFTS.…”
Section: Influence Of the Aspect Ratio Of The Precipitatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although θ precipitates in Al-Cu alloy have a large aspect ratio, this geometric feature may be changed by the addition of alloying elements which modify the interfacial energy between the Al matrix and the precipitate (Mitlin et al, 2000;Yang et al, 2016;Duan et al, 2017). Thus, it is interesting to analyze the influence of the precipitate aspect ratio on the mechanisms of dislocation-precipitate interaction in the presence of the SFTS.…”
Section: Influence Of the Aspect Ratio Of The Precipitatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the addition of lithium to 0.5 wt.% facilitates the precipitation of θ′ (Al 2 Cu) phase with a refined dispersion in the matrix of 2xxx series aluminum alloys, while higher lithium content (1.0 wt.%) results in the formation of T 1 (Al 2 CuLi) as the dominant precipitant [23]. T 2 (Al 6 CuLi 3 ) [16] and δ′ (Al 3 Li) [24,25] phases are also common precipitates in Al–Cu–Li alloys. According to Li et al [16,26,27], the θ′ phase usually acts as the cathode compared to the matrix, while T 1 and T 2 are anodic to the alloy base, indicating that further addition of lithium can change the initiation behavior of pitting corrosion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this transformation, however, the h 0 thickening with modification of the d 0 to match the newly formed h 0 /d 0 interface structure will inevitably cause additional lattice distortions between the nanocomposite precipitate and the a-Al matrix, which in turn restricts the thickness of the h 0 precipitates. As a result, relatively thin d 0 /h 0 /d 0 precipitates (3-4 nm in total thickness with only 2-6 Cu-layers) were always observed in experiments [7,8,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In the past decades, the T 1 nano-precipitate as the most effective strengthening phase has attracted significant amounts of research efforts to favor its formation in Al-Li alloys through careful alloy design and thermomechanical processing [3][4][5]. Besides the T 1 , nanocomposite precipitates with the association of different precipitates, such as d 0 /h 0 /d 0 , h 0 /b 0 and h 0 /d 0 /b 0 , have been commonly found in Al-Li alloys by adding Cu and Zr elements [6][7][8]. It is proven that the preprecipitate h 0 can serve as a preferential site for the nucleation of d 0 and b 0 nanoparticles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation