2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.dsp.2020.102658
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interference control in sliding window detection processes using a Bayesian approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the threshold is determined according to [ 7 ], is set to 3. Based on the three sliding window scales of 16, 24 and 32 commonly used in marine radar target detection [ 5 , 6 ], the sliding window scale N of WL-CFAR is set to these three sizes, and then a large number of comparisons are made by using experimental data. The results show that when the sliding window scale N is 32, the WL-CFAR detector has the best detection effect on the experimental data.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since the threshold is determined according to [ 7 ], is set to 3. Based on the three sliding window scales of 16, 24 and 32 commonly used in marine radar target detection [ 5 , 6 ], the sliding window scale N of WL-CFAR is set to these three sizes, and then a large number of comparisons are made by using experimental data. The results show that when the sliding window scale N is 32, the WL-CFAR detector has the best detection effect on the experimental data.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TM-CFAR improves its detection performance in uniform environment by deleting a certain number of minimum values and maximum values in the sorted reference unit gray value sequence. In the meantime, the Bayesian method was introduced to improve the robustness of the CFAR detector [ 6 ]. A Bayesian detector reduces the influence of the interfering targets by modeling and removing them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It will replace the previous manual monitoring or fixed-threshold detection methods, whose thresholds can be dynamically adjusted in real time according to the amplitude of the noise level, thus achieving a balance between false alarm probability and detection probability. To achieve this goal, the constant false alarm rate detector 13 in radar detection theory is used for the real-time detection of pipeline leakage signals. Constant false alarm rate (CFAR) detector is an adaptive threshold method that detects the target with a constant false alarm probability level, which eliminates the problem of threshold failure due to noise level variations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%