2011
DOI: 10.1002/jbio.201000096
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interferometric fiber optic sensors for biomedical applications of optoacoustic imaging

Abstract: We present a non-metallic interferometric silica optical fiber ultrasonic wideband sensor for optoacoustic imaging applications. The ultrasonic sensitivity of this sensor has been characterized over the frequency range from 1 to 10 MHz. A comparative analysis has been carried out between this sensor and an array of piezoelectric transducers using optoacoustic signals generated from an optical absorbent embedded in a tissue mimicking phantom. Also, a two dimensional reconstructed image of the phantom using the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 3, left c shows the response of sensor 1 before (solid blue line) and after (dashed green line) the displacement of the transducer. The measured time delay between the responses was 0.425μs which implies speed of sound of v~1494m/s, in agreement with the known values of speed of sound in water 10 . Next we tested the response of the sensor to sinusoidal excitations.…”
Section: Experimental Test Of the Methods And Resultssupporting
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 3, left c shows the response of sensor 1 before (solid blue line) and after (dashed green line) the displacement of the transducer. The measured time delay between the responses was 0.425μs which implies speed of sound of v~1494m/s, in agreement with the known values of speed of sound in water 10 . Next we tested the response of the sensor to sinusoidal excitations.…”
Section: Experimental Test Of the Methods And Resultssupporting
confidence: 65%
“…The second approach is based on two-arms interferometers where one of the arms (i.e. the sensing arm) is exposed to the acoustic wave 10 . This leads to phase variations in the sensing arm which are translated into intensity fluctuations at the detector output.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sensitivity of this system was reported to be 1.66 mV/Pa at 1.5 MHz, the minimum detectable pressure (MDP) was not reported. 11 However, for some earlier versions the MDP values have been presented including measured 21 and estimated using only the thermal noise generated by the detector capacitance according to the Nyquist law. 19,22 The Twente photoacoustic mammoscope (PAM) has been previously developed in our group in 2004.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optical detectors utilizing interferometric techniques [43,[53][54][55], oblique-incidence reflectance [56], microring resonators [57], fiber-optic lines [58,59], and laser beam deflection [60,61] can also be applied to detect ultrawideband optoacoustic signals. In addition to ultrawideband sensitivity, there are three main advantages of optical detection: (1) possibility for remote (noncontact) optoacoustic detection; (2) small finite size of the virtual detectors enabled by the tightly focused laser beam, which in turn yields high lateral resolution; and (3) possibility of avoiding acoustic diffraction and wavefront distortion in the handheld probes operating in the backward mode [62].…”
Section: Optoacoustic Transducersmentioning
confidence: 99%