“…However, our sense from the present study and other recent computational modeling studies is that the computational evidence is increasingly supportive of the notion that callosal influences are excitatory. Not only do excitatory callosal influences explain the cerebral metabolic changes of diaschisis seen with stroke and callosal sectioning, but they have also provided a better account for some poststroke clinical findings (e.g., Rizzo & Robin, 1996) when these have been studied computationally (Shevtsova & Reggia, 2000). But if one accepts this hypothesis, it leaves open the question of how marked lateralization, such as occurs with language, can occur in the context of excitatory callosal influences, because in the past, qualitative hemispheric specialization has consistently proven easier to obtain in computational models when callosal influences are assumed to be inhibitory.…”