2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.06.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interhemispheric functional reorganization after cross nerve transfer: Via cortical or subcortical connectivity?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A previous study reported an “interhemispheric” remodeling pattern of M1 in patients with TBPI after contralateral C7 nerve transfer (Hua, Li, et al., 2012; Hua, Zuo, et al., 2012). In a follow‐up period of 3 years or longer, the silent contralateral M1 was found to be reactivated by movement of the injured hand (Beaulieu et al., 2006; Liu et al., 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…A previous study reported an “interhemispheric” remodeling pattern of M1 in patients with TBPI after contralateral C7 nerve transfer (Hua, Li, et al., 2012; Hua, Zuo, et al., 2012). In a follow‐up period of 3 years or longer, the silent contralateral M1 was found to be reactivated by movement of the injured hand (Beaulieu et al., 2006; Liu et al., 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Several animal studies about reorganization or compensatory effects within the cerebral cortex have been reported (Pawela et al 2010;Hua et al 2012). Regarding the visual cortex, a clinical study demonstrated that upon damage of the ipsilateral side, an increase in the glucose metabolism of the contralateral side relative to the extent of the damage could be observed (Batista et al 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4][5][6] This in turn may result in changes in white matter volume and interhemispheric connectivity. [7][8][9][10] White matter volume changes would be reflected in corpus callosum volumetry. [11][12][13][14][15] As a corollary, disruption of interhemispheric coactivation may result in bilateral effects on the brain.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%