2020
DOI: 10.3390/genes11050555
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interindividual Variation in Cardiorespiratory Fitness: A Candidate Gene Study in Han Chinese People

Abstract: Cardiorespiratory fitness, as assessed through peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak), is a powerful health indicator. We aimed to evaluate the influence of several candidate causal genetic variants on VO2peak level in untrained Han Chinese people. A total of 1009 participants (566 women; age [mean ± SD] 40 ± 14 years, VO2peak 29.9 ± 7.1 mL/kg/min) performed a maximal incremental cycling test for VO2peak determination. Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral whole blood, and genotyping analysis was performed on 125 ge… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More than half of the inter-individual differences in maximal oxygen uptake (VO 2 max) is determined by a polygenic effect [ 1 , 2 ]. In addition, at least 97 genes in nuclear or mitochondrial genomes have been identified to affect VO 2 max trainability [ 3 ], and variation in mitochondria-related genes is associated with exercise response phenotypes [ 4 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More than half of the inter-individual differences in maximal oxygen uptake (VO 2 max) is determined by a polygenic effect [ 1 , 2 ]. In addition, at least 97 genes in nuclear or mitochondrial genomes have been identified to affect VO 2 max trainability [ 3 ], and variation in mitochondria-related genes is associated with exercise response phenotypes [ 4 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, the inter-individual variability of observed responses to training, such as HIIT, according to the study by Walsh et al (2020) , is a combination of: (i) individual responses to perseverative exercise training (subject-training interaction), (ii) day-to-day biological variation and TE (random variation), and (iii) physiological responses associated with behavioral/maturational changes, not attributable to exercise (e.g., within-person variability) ( Walsh et al, 2020 ). This includes genetic ( Mann et al, 2014 ; Sparks, 2017 ; Bonafiglia et al, 2020 ; Del Coso et al, 2020 ), climatic ( Corbett et al, 2018 ), cognitive ( Atkinson and Batterham, 2015 ), stress and sleep status ( Mann et al, 2014 ), gender, age, time of day variation ( Mann et al, 2014 ; Sparks, 2017 ), training status ( Pickering and Kiely, 2019 ), physiological ( Williamson et al, 2017 ; Atkinson et al, 2019 ), and statistical outcomes ( Swinton et al, 2018 ; Bonafiglia et al, 2020 ; Chrzanowski-Smith et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…within-person variability; Walsh et al, 2020 ). This includes genetic ( Mann et al, 2014 ; Sparks, 2017 ; Bonafiglia et al, 2020 ; Del Coso et al, 2020 ), climatic ( Corbett et al, 2018 ), cognitive ( Atkinson and Batterham, 2015 ), stress and sleep status ( Mann et al, 2014 ), gender, age, time of day variation ( Mann et al, 2014 ; Sparks, 2017 ), training status ( Pickering and Kiely, 2019 ), physiological ( Williamson et al, 2017 ; Atkinson et al, 2019 ), and statistical ( Swinton et al, 2018 ; Chrzanowski-Smith et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%