2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10957-006-9043-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interior-Point Solver for Large-Scale Quadratic Programming Problems with Bound Constraints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…compute δw k by solving the system (3) compute θ k as in (9) However, in [9,28] it has been observed that, in practice, the following simple choice for the step length,…”
Section: The Potential Reduction Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…compute δw k by solving the system (3) compute θ k as in (9) However, in [9,28] it has been observed that, in practice, the following simple choice for the step length,…”
Section: The Potential Reduction Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests that the line search (8) can be replaced by (9). The PR method previously described can be summarized into the algorithmic framework in Fig.…”
Section: The Potential Reduction Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This preconditioner allows to specify a priori, through a suitable parameter, the amount of fill-in for the incomplete factorization, without the need of using a drop tolerance; thus it has a predictable memory behaviour, which is a desirable feature in large-scale optimization algorithms. An adaptive choice of the fill-in parameter is performed at each PR step; a suitable diagonal scaling of the condensed matrix is also applied to improve the quality of this matrix [17].…”
Section: Inertia Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The complexity of the problem can be derived from the data structures used and from the mathematical expression of the objective function and the constraints. If the objective function is linear, or convex quadratic, and the problem has box, linear, or convex quadratic constraints, then the optimization problem can be solved efficiently by particular methods, which are tailored to the objective function [6,13,18]. If the objective function and the constraints are nonlinear without any restriction, then more general approaches must be used.…”
Section: Modeling Real-life Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%