2016
DOI: 10.4103/1305-7456.178299
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intermaxillary tooth size discrepancy in a Pakistani population: A stereomicroscope versus digital caliper

Abstract: Objective:Comprehensive diagnosis and treatment planning are essential in a successful orthodontic practice. The purpose of this study is to determine and compare intermaxillary tooth size discrepancy (IMTSD) using traditional digital caliper (DC) measurement on plaster dental models and stereomicroscopic digital dental models (SM).Materials and Methods:The samples were randomly selected from different states of Pakistan. Total 7168 variables were measured on plaster dental casts (128) and SM digital dental mo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…45 In this regard, we assumed Anusavice criteria to detect chipping, fractures, and other causes of failure even if his method was proposed for posterior prosthetic restorations. 27 The decision to deeply focus our attention on proportions of teeth was due to the main importance of this aspect in esthetical rehabilitations in dentistry 46 ; our data were found to be generally in accordance with those in the literature. 47 However, some clarifications are needed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…45 In this regard, we assumed Anusavice criteria to detect chipping, fractures, and other causes of failure even if his method was proposed for posterior prosthetic restorations. 27 The decision to deeply focus our attention on proportions of teeth was due to the main importance of this aspect in esthetical rehabilitations in dentistry 46 ; our data were found to be generally in accordance with those in the literature. 47 However, some clarifications are needed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Among the included studies, no study was of high quality. Moreover, 47 articles presented medium quality, of which 11 articles presented 8 points (Asma, 2013; Bugaighis et al, 2015; Cançado et al, 2015; Celikoglu et al, 2013; Ismail and Abuaffan, 2015; Machado et al, 2018; McSwiney et al, 2014; Nie and Lin, 1999; Shahid et al, 2016; Saritha et al, 2017; Ta et al, 2001) and 39 articles presented 7 points (Al-Duliamy et al, 2016; Al Sulaimani and Afify, 2006; Alkofide and Hashim, 2002; Carreiro et al, 2005; Chugh et al, 2015; Cİğer et al, 2006; Crosby and Alexander, 1989; Elsheikhi et al, 2017; Endo et al, 2007, 2009, 2010; Fernandes et al, 2010; Freire et al, 2007; Hashim et al, 2015; Hyder et al, 2012; Jindal and Bunger, 2013; Jóias and Scanavini, 2011; Jóias et al, 2010; Kansal et al, 2012; Lavelle, 1972; Lee et al, 2011; Lombardo et al, 2016; Machado et al, 2018; Manopatanakul and Watanawirun, 2011; Maurya et al, 2015; Mollabashi et al, 2019; Mulimani et al, 2018; O’Mahony et al, 2011; Oktay and Ulukaya, 2010; Patel et al, 2017; Ricci et al, 2013; Sakoda et al, 2016; Shahid et al, 2016; Shastri et al, 2015; Škrinjarić et al, 2018; Uysal et al, 2005; Vela et al, 2011; Zerouaoui et al, 2014). Five were of low quality (Anil and Mo...…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After 1999 larger datasets were published on different continents. Fifty-two crosssectional studies from four different continents, namely Africa (12,30,34,36,(44)(45)(46), Asia (12,24,25,31,32,34,35,37,38,(40)(41)(42)(47)(48)(49)(50)(51)(52)(53)(54)(55)(56)(57)(58), South America (26,33,39,(59)(60)(61)(62)(63)(64)(65)(66), and Europe (12,22,43,(67)(68)(69)(70)(71)(72)…”
Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the included studies, no study presented high quality. Moreover, forty-seven articles presented medium quality, of which eleven articles presented 8 points (30,33,37,43,44,48,52,53,58,67,75), and thirty-six articles presented 7 points (12,22,25,26,31,(34)(35)(36)38,39,42,(45)(46)(47)(48)(49)(50)(51)(54)(55)(56)(57)(59)(60)(61)(62)(63)(64)(65)67,68,(70)(71)(72)76). Five were of low quality (77-81) and, consequently, were excluded.…”
Section: Risk Of Bias Across Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation