2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-96269-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intermediate ice scour disturbance is key to maintaining a peak in biodiversity within the shallows of the Western Antarctic Peninsula

Abstract: Climate-related disturbance regimes are changing rapidly with profound consequences for ecosystems. Disturbance is often perceived as detrimental to biodiversity; however, the literature is divided on how they influence each other. Disturbance events in nature are diverse, occurring across numerous interacting trophic levels and multiple spatial and temporal scales, leading to divergence between empirical and theoretical studies. The shallow Antarctic seafloor has one of the largest disturbance gradients on ea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent work along the WAP narrowed the bathymetry of the peak in biodiversity to between 50 and 60 m depth, coincident with the depth of intermediate levels of ice scour disturbance, confirming expectations that ice scour may maintain high biodiversity across these depths (Robinson et al, 2021). Assuming that IDH does indeed explain the diversity-disturbance pattern seen across this depth gradient, the mechanisms behind this observation should be reflected in assemblage functional structure (Houseman and Gross, 2011;Villéger et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 52%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Recent work along the WAP narrowed the bathymetry of the peak in biodiversity to between 50 and 60 m depth, coincident with the depth of intermediate levels of ice scour disturbance, confirming expectations that ice scour may maintain high biodiversity across these depths (Robinson et al, 2021). Assuming that IDH does indeed explain the diversity-disturbance pattern seen across this depth gradient, the mechanisms behind this observation should be reflected in assemblage functional structure (Houseman and Gross, 2011;Villéger et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…At each of the three sites, 50 random areas of seabed were recorded at every 10 m depth interval from 10 to 100 m depth (total 1,500 images), collected between February and June 2016, using a modified mini-ROV, DeepTrekkerG2. Macro/megafauna (> 0.5 mm) were originally described across this depth gradient by Robinson et al (2021) linking peaks in biodiversity to intermediate ice scour rates, with each specimen with the sample image being counted and identified to into morphotypes. Here, morphotypes are defined as a species or group of species that a have a distinct or conspicuous morphology that allows identification and catergorisation from other species across all sample images.…”
Section: Macrofauna Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, Zwerschke et al (2022) focuses on deeper depths (104-515 m) which are representative of the majority of the Antarctic continental shelf. There, iceberg scour is decreased by a factor of ~50 to 4 scours/km 2 since the area has become ice free (Robinson et al, 2021).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%