Intermediate-level knowledge in child-computer interaction

Barendregt, Wolmet; Bekker, Tilde; Börjesson, Peter; Eriksson, Eva; Vasalou, Asimina; Torgersson, Olof

doi:10.1145/3202185.3205865

Cited by 8 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Closing the gap between the theory and practice/design is a long-standing challenge in CCI [1]. Despite the fact that the majority of contemporary CCI research tend to follow the latest technological developments (e.g., papers exploring the application of new technology to the CCI domain) and producing ''artifact-centered evaluations'' [21], during the last years we have seen growing discussions and initiatives supporting the development of knowledge that goes ''beyond an artifact'' [22]. Such a line of work will allow the field to develop models, theories and guidelines that could guide the design of interactive artifacts for children beyond particular artifacts and accelerate the progress in our field.…”

Section: Avenues Of Future Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

Movement forward: The continued growth of Child–Computer Interaction research

Giannakos

Horn

Read

et al. 2020

International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Avenues Of Future Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

Movement forward: The continued growth of Child–Computer Interaction research

Giannakos

Horn

Read

et al. 2020

International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Höök and Löwgren [30] pointed out that this is the predominate approach in HCI -using empirical research for knowledge production at the theoretical and instances level. While it is useful to create such forms of knowledge, it may be hard for designers to build upon these outcome as they are particular instances and not built around reuse across other cases [6]. However, in design-oriented research there are other forms of knowledge that are neither generalisable like theories nor particular like instances.…”

Section: Intermediate-level Knowledge In Hcimentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In our work, we have no preconception of what form of intermediate-level knowledge has better advantages compared to others; we think this can only be judged by those who evaluate and utilise them. However, what we can contribute here is a suggestion of how to generate this form of knowledge for our specific case study inspired by the above two forms of intermediate-level knowledge and very recent developments [6].…”

Section: Intermediate-level Knowledge In Hcimentioning

confidence: 99%

A Tale of Two Perspectives

Aladwan

Kelly

Baker

et al. 2019

Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We present a conceptual framework grounded in both users' reviews and HCI theories, residing between practices and theories as a form of intermediate-level knowledge in interaction design. Previous research has examined different forms of intermediary knowledge such as conceptual structures, strong concepts, and bridging concepts. Within HCI, these forms are generic and rise either from theories or particular instances. In this work, we created and evaluated a conceptual framework for a specific domain (instructional fitness apps). We first extracted the particular instances using users' online reviews and conceptualised them as an expectations and experiences framework. Second, within the framework, we evaluated the artefact related constructs using Norman's design principles. Third, we evaluated beyond the artefact related constructs using distributed cognition theory. We present an analysis of such intermediate-level knowledge with the aim of informing future designs. CCS CONCEPTS • Human-centered computing → User models; HCI theory, concepts and models.

show abstract

“…Compelled to accept our own this invitation, we organized a workshop at IDC 2018 in Trondheim. We called our workshop "Intermediate-Level Knowledge in Child-Computer Interaction" [4] Five years after the conference's instantiation, several of the founders looked back at the development of the field [1]. They concluded that "CCI is still finding its way.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%