2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2007.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intermethod agreement and interobserver correlation of radiologic acromiohumeral distance measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
67
2
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
67
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The correlation coefficient between the UMI as measured on plain radiographs versus CT was even greater (r = 0.86) when shoulder radiographs are taken in a controlled fashion [34]. The interobserver variability for measurement of the AHI on MRI or CT was reported as 0.8 by Werner et al [39]. The interobserver variability for measurement of the UMI in our study was 0.23 (fair).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 45%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The correlation coefficient between the UMI as measured on plain radiographs versus CT was even greater (r = 0.86) when shoulder radiographs are taken in a controlled fashion [34]. The interobserver variability for measurement of the AHI on MRI or CT was reported as 0.8 by Werner et al [39]. The interobserver variability for measurement of the UMI in our study was 0.23 (fair).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 45%
“…Third, MRI is obtained with the patient in the supine position whereas plain radiographs are performed with the patient sitting. Despite this, the two techniques reportedly [39] have an intermethod correlation coefficient for the AHI of r = 0.6 (moderately high). The correlation coefficient between the UMI as measured on plain radiographs versus CT was even greater (r = 0.86) when shoulder radiographs are taken in a controlled fashion [34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The proximal line (line D) was placed tangent to the sclerotic line, representing the ´roof`at the undersurface of the acromion. Some scholars also use this line to measure the acromiohumeral distance (Werner et al, 2008;Thompson et al, 2011). A second line was drawn tangentially to the superior and inferior osseous margins of the glenoid cavity, which is the same as in measuring AI.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Az AHD-t Werner közleményében leírt módon mértük meg [25]. Az acromion alsó corticalis felszínére fektetett egyenes, valamint a caput humeri legfelső cranialis csú-csát érintő, az előzővel párhuzamos egyenes közti távol-ság adja meg az AHD-t. Az ép oldalhoz képest 5 esetben (23,8%) volt szűkebb az acromion és a humerusfej …”
Section: Az Acromiohumeralis Távolság éS Az éLetminőség öSszevetéseunclassified