2018
DOI: 10.1111/bju.14239
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intermittent vs continuous docetaxel therapy in patients with metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer – a phase III study (PRINCE)

Abstract: Intermittent docetaxel chemotherapy was non-inferior to continuous therapy for 1-year survival; non-inferiority in regard to OS was not reached.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
8
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Различия в ВБП и среднее время до прогрессирования были незначимы. Средний интер-вал между введениями в группе интермиттирующей терапии составил 110 сут (13-486 сут), или 38 % от об-щей длительности лечения, однако это не привело к улучшению профиля токсичности [59].…”
Section: диагностика и лечение опухолей мочеполовой системы рак предunclassified
“…Различия в ВБП и среднее время до прогрессирования были незначимы. Средний интер-вал между введениями в группе интермиттирующей терапии составил 110 сут (13-486 сут), или 38 % от об-щей длительности лечения, однако это не привело к улучшению профиля токсичности [59].…”
Section: диагностика и лечение опухолей мочеполовой системы рак предunclassified
“…8,[14][15][16] However, theoretically, continuous therapy may have better results compared to intermittent therapy. 17 A Phase III clinical trial (PRINCE) 18 compared continuous docetaxel therapy with intermittent docetaxel therapy in patients with mCRPC. Although the one-year survival showed that intermittent docetaxel therapy was not inferior to continuous docetaxel therapy, the median OS of continuous docetaxel was better than that of intermittent docetaxel (19.3 mouths vs 18.3mouths).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients were randomized to receive up to 3 or 4 cycles of chemotherapy and then restarted upon disease progression (clinical [RE-CIST] or biochemical progression [PSA > 4ng/mL with > 50% of baseline]). The study concluded that there was no difference in terms of OS (18.3 vs. 19.3 months in the continuous arm; HR 1.14, 95% CI 0.75-1.72, p = 0.535), PFS (10 vs. 5.4 months; HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.42-1.04, p = 0.077), or safety profile between both regimens (grade 3-4 anemia in 1.3 vs. 3.8% and neutropenia 8.9% in both groups) [32].…”
Section: Dr In the Intermittent Treatment Strategy In Mcrpcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were pain (14.7%), leukocytopenia (6.7%), and nail disorders (5.3%) [31]. Last, a prospective non-inferiority phase III trial (PRINCE) compared the intermittent to the continuous administration of docetaxel (75 mg/m 2 every 3 weeks or 35 mg/m 2 weekly for 3 weeks on a 4-week schedule) in 187 mCRPC patients [32]. Patients were randomized to receive up to 3 or 4 cycles of chemotherapy and then restarted upon disease progression (clinical [RE-CIST] or biochemical progression [PSA > 4ng/mL with > 50% of baseline]).…”
Section: Dr In the Intermittent Treatment Strategy In Mcrpcmentioning
confidence: 99%