2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jorganchem.2004.10.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intermolecular versus intramolecular C–H activation reaction in the thermolysis of [Ru(Me)Cp*(PMe2Ph)2] (Cp*=η5-C5Me5): formation and crystallographic characterisation of [Ru(Ph)Cp*(PMe2Ph)2]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Ru-C 6 H 5 distance in (3) is very similar to that found in Cp * Ru(PMe 2 Ph) 2 C 6 H 5 (2.104 Å) [5]. The angles given in Table 1 are all bigger for the phenyl compound as compared with the methyl compound, which may be due to steric crowding at the metal centre.…”
Section: Ru Chsupporting
confidence: 65%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The Ru-C 6 H 5 distance in (3) is very similar to that found in Cp * Ru(PMe 2 Ph) 2 C 6 H 5 (2.104 Å) [5]. The angles given in Table 1 are all bigger for the phenyl compound as compared with the methyl compound, which may be due to steric crowding at the metal centre.…”
Section: Ru Chsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…A possible mechanism for this reaction involves loss of CO, oxidative addition of a benzene C-D bond, elimination of CH 3 D and then re-coordination of CO. Alternatively, the mechanism could involve a concerted process, as has been suggested by others for related systems [5,6]. There is also the possibility that the methane is generated from one of the methyl groups on the pentamethylcyclopentadienyl ring.…”
Section: Ru Chmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation