2012
DOI: 10.5539/ibr.v5n9p128
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Internal Control and Audit Program Effectiveness: Empirical Evidence from Jordan

Abstract: This article examines the relationship between some components (i.e. risk assessment, control environment and control activities) of internal control system and the effectiveness of audit program in Jordan. Based on 43 usable questionnaires, the results of the study show that the risk assessment does contribute significantly toward an effective audit program. On the other hand, the results of analysis indicate that control environment and control activities do not contribute significantly toward an effective a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Karagiorgos et al (2011) study the relationship between internal control and the effectiveness of internal audit in Greek hotels. Sawalqa & Qtish (2012) study the relationship between internal control and the effectiveness of audit program. Jokipii (2010) studies the determinants and consequences of internal control in firms.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Karagiorgos et al (2011) study the relationship between internal control and the effectiveness of internal audit in Greek hotels. Sawalqa & Qtish (2012) study the relationship between internal control and the effectiveness of audit program. Jokipii (2010) studies the determinants and consequences of internal control in firms.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measurements for internal control components and asset misappropriation are defined based on several previous studies (Nguyen, 2017;Jokipii, 2010;Karagiorgos et al, 2011;Ta, 2017;Sawalqa & Qtish, 2012). In particular, there are 21 measurement indicators used to represent the five internal control components, 4 measurement indicators used to represent the popularity level of asset misappropriation.…”
Section: Questionnaire Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Al Sawalqa and Qtish (2012) initiate and use quantitative and qualitative research to develop and validate the effectiveness measurement of the audit program, including control environment, risk assessment, and control activities. This study suggests that the relationship between the different components of internal control and the effectiveness of the audit program is positive.…”
Section: Research Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The internal controller of COSO 1992 and SAS 78 is a process influenced by the board of commissioners, management and other business unit personnel designed to gain reasonable assurance about the achievement of objectives in the following matters: (1) Reliability of financial reporting (2) Compliance with applicable laws and regulations (3) Effectiveness and efficiency of operation (Daniela & Attila, 2013;Rae et al, 2017). The internal control component of COSO (Committee of Sponsoring Organization) consists of five components: control environment, risk assessment, control activities, information and communication, monitoring (Mosteller & Poddar, 2017) Researches on the implementation of COSO-based internal control and good university governance refer to studies by Sawalqa & Qtish (2012), Agyei-Mensah (2016), Ghozali & Achmad (2017), and Ansori (2018). Sawalqa & Qtish's (2012) research aims to examine the role of internal control elements: control environment, risk assessment, control activities, information and communication, and monitoring, in improving the pillars of corporate governance: accountability, fairness, responsibility answer, and transparency in the insurance company.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The internal control component of COSO (Committee of Sponsoring Organization) consists of five components: control environment, risk assessment, control activities, information and communication, monitoring (Mosteller & Poddar, 2017) Researches on the implementation of COSO-based internal control and good university governance refer to studies by Sawalqa & Qtish (2012), Agyei-Mensah (2016), Ghozali & Achmad (2017), and Ansori (2018). Sawalqa & Qtish's (2012) research aims to examine the role of internal control elements: control environment, risk assessment, control activities, information and communication, and monitoring, in improving the pillars of corporate governance: accountability, fairness, responsibility answer, and transparency in the insurance company. These results suggest that internal control plays an important role in improving the pillars of corporate governance in Jordanian insurance companies, and the success of corporate governance requires compliance with all elements of internal control.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%