2022
DOI: 10.3390/su14042261
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Internal Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from Chinese Companies

Abstract: Stakeholder management researchers have recently put a lot of effort into figuring out why organizations facing extensive pressure respond differently to social responsibilities. In particular, ethics researchers believe that senior management must drive corporate social responsibility since their attitudes toward such issues are so important. In line with this sentiment, our study develops a framework of management power, composed of CEOs’ power and the organizations’ power, and explores how managerial power … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 118 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The research on corporate social responsibility is mainly from the perspective of internal corporate governance. For example, researchers such as Farman Ullah Khan [12]studied the effect of senior managers' heterogeneous rights on corporate social responsibility performance. Ju Hyoung Park [13]believes that corporate social responsibility activities can increase the value of corporate and points out that the stronger the nepotism of corporate directors, the more negative the impact on the amount of weight.…”
Section: A Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The research on corporate social responsibility is mainly from the perspective of internal corporate governance. For example, researchers such as Farman Ullah Khan [12]studied the effect of senior managers' heterogeneous rights on corporate social responsibility performance. Ju Hyoung Park [13]believes that corporate social responsibility activities can increase the value of corporate and points out that the stronger the nepotism of corporate directors, the more negative the impact on the amount of weight.…”
Section: A Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, executives can use optional CSRD necessity resourcefully ( Khan et al, 2022 ). The study proposes that they might have a positively prejudiced discernment of their corporate social responsibility actions ( Cormier et al, 2004 ; Saz-Gil et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Theoretical Framework and Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…McWilliams and Siegel (2001) consider that in essence CSR are those actions that bring companies closer to society beyond the legal aspects to which they are obliged. CSR is also a concept that can be connected with corporate governance, especially with those elements that are related to managers making important decisions that affects society (Khan, et al, 2022). Although these two concepts (Sustainability and CSR) have similarities in terms of their practical application by focusing on not privileging economic profits as the sole objective of companies, both concepts have been developed in the literature, each in its own field of study, with diverse practical applications.…”
Section: Sustainabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%